Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:138   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 38-41

Laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score and patient outcomes


1 Emergency and Critical Care Center, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki City; Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
2 Emergency and Critical Care Center, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki City, Japan

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jun Fujinaga
Emergency and Critical Care Center, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki City, Okayama 710-8602
Japan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_17_20

Rights and Permissions

Context: The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score helps to diagnose necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI). The LRINEC score has been reported to be associated with poor prognosis, although few studies have evaluated this association. Aims: We aimed to describe the characteristics of NSTI and assess whether the LRINEC score was associated with mortality and amputation. Settings and Design: We conducted a retrospective observational study from January 2007 to May 2018, in a Japanese tertiary care hospital. Subjects and Methods: Patients with NSTI were identified through our hospital database using the discharge diagnosis. We extracted data on patient characteristics, laboratory examinations, microbiological information, treatment, and in-hospital mortality. Statistical Analysis Used: We estimated the odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for in-hospital mortality using logistic regression models. Results: We identified 58 patients. The median LRINEC score was 8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6–9). Forty-four patients (75.9%) scored 6 or more. The eight patients with amputations had a median score of 6 (IQR: 4.5–7.5) versus 8 (IQR: 7–9) for patients who underwent debridement (P = 0.091). Survivors and nonsurvivors had median scores of 8 (IQR: 6–9) and 6 (IQR: 5–8), respectively (P = 0.148). The OR for mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis was 10.5 (95% CI: 1.00–110.36; P = 0.050). Conclusions: There was no association between the LRINEC score and patients' outcomes: mortality and amputation. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the utility of the LRINEC score and factors associated with poor prognosis in patients with NSTI.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed116    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded2    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal