|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 208-212
|Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for rib fracture-associated pain management in emergency department
Subhankar Paul, Sanjeev Kumar Bhoi, Tej Prakash Sinha, Gaurav Kumar
Department of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
|Date of Submission||02-Dec-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||03-Feb-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||18-Sep-2020|
| Abstract|| |
Context: Traumatic Rib fractures are common and painful conditions to present in the emergency department. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a newer technique which is being used for managing postthoracotomy, thoracoscopic surgery, or post mastectomy pain by the anesthetists. However, we have recently started utilizing this novel technique in our emergency department for rib fracture patients with severe pain. Settings and Methods: We present a case series of 10 patients of multiple rib fractures (MFRs) with persistent Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale 7 or more even after intravenous analgesics where this block was applied by trained emergency physicians (EP). Results: Following SAPB median (± IQR) pain score reduction was 5 (±4) at 30 min and 7.5 (±2) after 60 min of administering the block. There were no incidences of block failure or block-related complications in our series. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided SAPB can be used safely by trained EP in the emergency department to relieve acute severe analgesic-resistant pain in MFR patients.
Keywords: Regional anesthesia, rib fractures, serratus anterior plane block, ultrasound
|How to cite this article:|
Paul S, Bhoi SK, Sinha TP, Kumar G. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for rib fracture-associated pain management in emergency department. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2020;13:208-12
|How to cite this URL:|
Paul S, Bhoi SK, Sinha TP, Kumar G. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for rib fracture-associated pain management in emergency department. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Oct 7];13:208-12. Available from: https://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2020/13/3/208/295367
| Introduction|| |
Rib fractures are among 10% of all injured patients presenting to the emergency department and results in significant morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. Uncontrolled pain due to rib fracture leads to impaired ventilatory function, atelectasis, and pneumonia. The effective and continuous analgesia is one of the key components of rib fracture management. Opiates have been the mainstay of pain management, which have significant side-effects, including respiratory depression, depressed cough reflex, and delirium. Hence, multimodal analgesia such as thoracic epidural analgesia and regional nerve blocks has been used.
Thoracic epidural analgesia has been standard of definitive pain therapy for multiple rib fractures (MFRs). However, it is technically difficult and usually not performed in the emergency department. Regional nerve blocks such as intercostals nerve blocks and paravertebral block are time-consuming, involve multiple injections and necessitate patient repositioning.
Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) has recently gained the interest of the anesthesiologists and pain physicians due to its efficacy, relative ease, single-injection method with limited side-effect profile. SAPB is being used in controlled environment such as OT or ICU for various breast surgeries and thoracotomy pain control by the anesthesiologists. However, there is limited literature regarding its feasibility and efficacy in the emergency department by the emergency physicians (EP) for acute pain. We are presenting here a case series of ultrasound-guided SAPB in 10 patients with MFRs in the emergency department by EP.
| Methods|| |
Patients with 3 or more rib fractures who had persistent Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) of 7 or more even after NSAIDS and Opioids administration were recruited for the block. Patients were recruited consecutively regardless of their body habitus or severity of injuries. ED pain team comprised of trained nurses who were not included directly in the block procedures, assessed pain scores of the patients before and after the blocks. The used pain assessment tool was DVPRS which utilized a combination of numerical rating scale with pictorial facial expressions, functional word descriptors, and color coding according to the level of pain. Authors performed SAPB as described by Blanco et al, and in few cases, deeper plane method was adopted as the body ergonomics was not conducive. The details of the procedure are being described.
The patient was recruited after informed consent and shifted to a monitored bed with intravenous cannula in situ.
- Equipment: A high-frequency (7–12 MHz) linear probe was used
- Personnel: Blocks were performed by the EP trained in the use of point of care ultrasound and procedural ultrasound under the supervision of consultants of emergency medicine
- Preparation: The block team, drugs, device, and appropriate nerve block needle were assembled in Red area where full resuscitation equipments including 20% Intralipid were available
- Positioning: The patient was kept in supine position with the arm abducted or in lateral position wherever feasible. The ultrasound machine was kept opposite to the operator, plugged in with powered on. Sterile technique, including an ultrasound transducer cover and sterile gel was employed [Figure 1]
- Probe positioning and marking: The probe (7–12 MHz) was placed in the sagittal plane, and the 5th rib in the mid-axillary line was identified first. Latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior muscles were identified overlying the 5th rib. The plane in between these two muscles was further confirmed by locating the thoracodorsal artery with color Doppler in that plane. Point of entry of the needle was marked with skin marker [Figure 2]
- After antiseptic dressing, a small skin-wheel was made at the marked point with subcutaneous infiltration of 1% lignocaine with adrenaline. A gap of 3–5 min was allowed to ensure the onset of the action of skin anesthesia
- Injection bupivacaine 0.5% was taken as 1 mg/kg body weight and diluted with equal volume of NS to make it a 0.25% solution while not exceeding a total volume of 40 ml
- After local anesthetic (LA) infiltration, a 50 mm 18 g Tuohy catheter needle was introduced through in-plane technique from superior-anterior to posterior-inferior direction with negative suction
- Once reached in the plane in between the serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi, aspiration was done to rule out any vascular puncture. Initially, 2–3 ml LA was injected to confirm hydrodissection between latissimus dorsi and the serratus muscle visible in ultrasound. Rest of the solution was given slowly under continuous ultrasound guidance [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. Throughout the procedure, patient's vitals, SpO2, and electrocardiography were continuously monitored
- Initial and subsequent pain scores at 30 and 60 min were noted to assess the adequacy of the block. The definition for block-success was to achieve a DVPRS of ≤4 on movement (coughing and deep breathing) and ≤3 on rest following the procedure. Failure to achieve a pain-score less than 50% of the pre-procedure pain-score after 60 min of the block was considered as the working definition of block failure in ED. Intermittent injection fentanyl was planned for breakthrough pain or block-failure
- Patients were monitored for 1 h in the resuscitation area particularly for any features of cardiac arrhythmias and LA systemic toxicity (LAST). Thereafter, they were followed up till the patients were in the ED. Serial lung ultrasounds were done to find any new onset or block-related complications.
|Figure 3: Normal sonoanatomy of serratus anterior plane block. LD: Latissimus Dorsi Muscle, SA: Serratus Anterior Muscle, white arrow showing 5th Rib, yellow arrow showing pleural line|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Ultrasound-guided needle tracking and hydrodissection by local anesthetic. LD: Latissimus dorsi muscle, SA: Serratus anterior muscle, White arrow showing needle tip with flow of local anesthetics|
Click here to view
| Results|| |
SAPB was done in 10 patients of MFRs with median (± IQR) pain score of 9 (±1.5) on arrival at the emergency department. Majority of our patients had posterior or posterior-lateral rib fractures (66%), and rest had anterior or lateral fractures. Average rib fracture score was 10.1 with a range of 3–43. Following SAPB median (± IQR) pain score reduction was 5 (±4) at 30 min and 7.5 (±2) after 60 min of administering the block. [Table 1] summarizes the patient characteristics and the effect of the SAPB block in our series. We did not have any case of block-failure in our series and none of our patients required any rescue analgesics during their stay in the ED. Two patients were discharged from ED with precautionary advices but there was no return to ED for pain or other complications. Other patients were admitted to definitive care units who reported no block-related complications.
|Table 1: Patient characteristics and the effect of the serratus anterior plane block|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
SAPB targets the lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves, which arise from the ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerves and traverse through the internal intercostal, external intercostal, and serratus anterior muscles to innervate the musculature of the anterolateral thorax.,, These branches of the intercostal nerves, therefore, travel through the two potential spaces above and below the serratus anterior muscle. At the level of the fifth rib, superficial plane is formed by the anterior aspect of the serratus anterior and the posterior aspect of the latissimus dorsi muscle. The deep plane is formed in between the posterior aspect of the serratus anterior and the external intercostal muscles and ribs. LA inserted into these planes thus spreads throughout the lateral chest wall along these fascial planes resulting in paresthesia of the t2-t9 dermatomes of the anterolateral thorax., The SAPB has been used effectively for the management of pain in the context of thoracotomy, thoracoscopic surgery, breast surgery, and postmastectomy pain syndrome,, since its initial description by Blanco et al.
The technique has been extrapolated for analgesia in MFRs. SAPB can be performed in patients lying supine, rendering it particularly useful when other injuries prevent patients sitting or rolling laterally to perform either paravertebral or thoracic epidural block. It is also suitable in coagulopathy and associated spinal trauma or traumatic brain injuries where paravertebral and epidural blocks are contraindicated. Kunhabdulla et al. avoided opioids and thoracic epidural anesthesia in a case of unilateral MFRs with morbidly obesity and obstructive sleep apnea using SAPB. Our case-series focused on 10 patients with MFRs where SAPB was performed by the EP in ED, which itself is scarcely reported in literature. Previously, a similar ED-based case report of only two patients was done by Durant et al.
Literatures suggest the use of various LAs such as ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and lignocaine. We have used injection bupivacaine (0.25%) which is comparable to Jadon et al, (0.25%) and Kunhabdulla et al, (0.125%) concentration. Camacho and Segura-Grau used (0.25%) levobupivacaine while Bossolasco et al injected (0.125%) ropivacaine with (1%) lignocaine for rib-fracture analgesia. Hence, we suggest that either bupivacaine or ropivacaine with or without additional lignocaine may be used. We injected up to 40 ml of LA as bolus in fascial plane for better spread and ensuring the safe total dose of bupivacaine (1 mg/kg) with dilution (1:1) as per recommendation by May et al. Durant et al and Bossolasco et al used 30 ml of LA as bolus whereas Jadon and Jain, Camacho and Segura-Grau, and Kunhabdulla et al used 20 ml of LA as bolus followed by continuous infusion through catheter. Hence, bolus of larger volume of LA is recommended for better spread within the fascial plane while ensuring not to exceed the total dose of the anesthetic.
The authors used in-plane approach in the majority of the cases which was also comparable to others studies.,,, Both Blanco et al and Bhoi et al found wider dermatomal spread and better pain control in superficial SAPB group. We have given mostly superficial plane block except in two cases of bilateral chest injuries where due to technical difficulty and complex positioning, we administered LA into deeper plane following out-of-plane approach. However, we got comparable pain-score reduction similar to the anterior plane block. All of the other case reports for rib-fracture analgesia reported the use of deeper plane method as they had inserted a catheter which was supposedly better fixed in the deeper plane.,, Jadon et al. had used both superficial and deep plane in a single patient of MFRs where he got similar, adequate, and effective analgesia. Hence, we suggest that body ergonomics is important in deciding the technical approach for SAPB.
There are head-to-head comparisons of SAPB versus other blocks in various conditions such as postthoracotomy and postmastectomy analgesia except rib fractures. Ökmen observed that SAPB and thoracic epidural block had comparable analgesia at 24 h after the surgery among postthoracotomy patients. Wang et al had compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided perioperative superficial plane SAPB and erector spinae block (ESPB) in radical mastectomy patients with good and safe analgesia. However, Durant et al suggested that SAPB provided excellent coverage for superficial procedures but not reliable as the sole anesthesia for deeper procedures such as thoracostomy tube placement mainly due to inconsistent spread of LA to the intercostal nerve-roots.
Reporting patterns of pain-score reduction following SAPB in rib fracture patients have been variable in literature. Durant et al reports a dynamic pain reduction in the numeric rating scale from 8/10 to 0/10 at 30 min after the block. Jadon et al reported good pain relief after 15 min of SAPB by observing visual analog scale score 2/10. We have used DVPRS and also have got adequate levels of pain-score reduction after SAPB (median [± IQR] pain score reduction of 5 [±4] at 30 min and 7.5 [±2] after 60 min).
Previous literature suggested that SAPB would be effective only for anterior Rib-fractures, sparing the posterior rib periosteum and intercostal muscles. Jain et al also reported two cases of failed SAPB in posteriorly located MFRs. However, Johnston et al demonstrated SAP injectate spreading to multiple intercostal nerves up to the medial border of the scapula in a cadaveric model of traumatic hemothorax. In our patients, we had administered SAPB regardless of the site of rib fractures and we have got adequate pain-score reduction though most of our patients had posterior-lateral fractures which was also similar to the results obtained by Rose et al in isolated posterior rib fractures.
Potential complications of SAPB are pneumothorax, vascular puncture, nerve injury, LAST, and infection. We did not encounter any of the above-mentioned complications similar to the other studies. Another complication is rebound pain as the analgesia provided by bupivacaine typically lasts for 6–8 h. Hence, Camacho and Segura-Grau suggested that continuous SAP block through a catheter in situ would be an effective method for analgesia in MFRs which can easily be accomplished at bedside in the ED. Although we have not tried SAP catheter till now due to technical difficulty and lack of expertise and experience, these case reports imply that continuous infusion through SAP catheter can be inserted in ED by trained EP. Moreover, the learning curve for ultrasound-guided SAPB is short under adequate supervision. This expertise may also be translated among emergency nurses who can deliver continuous pain-free services from ED to the definitive care. This new practice may be a game changer in addressing severe pain associated with MFRs facilitating patient satisfaction and early recovery.
| Conclusions|| |
Ultrasound-guided SAPB is a technically easy, safe, and effective block which can be performed by the EP as a part of multimodal analgesia in patients with traumatic MFRs.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Bergeron E, Lavoie A, Clas D, Moore L, Ratte S, Tetreault S, et al
. Elderly trauma patients with rib fractures are at greater risk of death and pneumonia. J Trauma 2003;54:478-85.
Ho AM, Karmakar MK, Critchley LA. Acute pain management of patients with multiple fractured ribs: A focus on regional techniques. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011;17:323-7.
May L, Hillermann C, Patil S. Rib fracture management. Bja Educ 2015;16:26-32.
Khemka R, Chakraborty A. Ultrasound-guided modified serratus anterior plane block for perioperative analgesia in breast oncoplastic surgery: A case series. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:231-4.
] [Full text]
Madabushi R, Tewari S, Gautam SK, Agarwal A, Agarwal A. Serratus anterior plane block: A new analgesic technique for post-thoracotomy pain. Pain Physician 2015;18:E421-4.
Buckenmaier CC 3rd
, Galloway KT, Polomano RC, McDuffie M, Kwon N, Gallagher RM. Preliminary validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a military population. Pain Med 2013;14:110-23.
Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: A novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia 2013;68:1107-13.
Mayes J, Davison E, Panahi P, Patten D, Eljelani F, Womack J, et al
. An anatomical evaluation of the serratus anterior plane block. Anaesthesia 2016;71:1064-9.
Khalil AE, Abdallah NM, Bashandy GM, Kaddah TA. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracotomy pain. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017;31:152-8.
Park MH, Kim JA, Ahn HJ, Yang MK, Son HJ, Seong BG. A randomised trial of serratus anterior plane block for analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia 2018;73:1260-4.
Zocca JA, Chen GH, Puttanniah VG, Hung JC, Gulati A. Ultrasound-guided serratus plane block for treatment of postmastectomy pain syndromes in breast cancer patients: A case series. Pain Pract 2017;17:141-6.
Pérez Herrero MA, López Álvarez S, Fadrique Fuentes A, Manzano Lorefice F, Bartolomé Bartolomé C, González de Zárate J. Quality of postoperative recovery after breast surgery. General anaesthesia combined with paravertebral versus serratus-intercostal block. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2016;63:564-71.
Piracha MM, Thorp SL, Puttanniah V, Gulati A. “A tale of two planes”: Deep versus superficial serratus plane block for postmastectomy pain syndrome. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2017;42:259-62.
Kunhabdulla NP, Agarwal A, Gaur A, Gautam SK, Gupta R, Agarwal A. Serratus anterior plane block for multiple rib fractures. Pain Physician 2014;17:E553-5.
Durant E, Dixon B, Luftig J, Mantuani D, Herring A. Ultrasound-guided serratus plane block for ED rib fracture pain control. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:197.e3.
Jadon A, Jain P, Sinha N, Agrawal A. Serratus anterior plane block for pain relief in multiple fractured ribs (MFRs); injection of local anesthetic above the serratus or below the serratus anterior muscle – A case report. Anesth Med Pract J 2016; G103.
Camacho FC, Segura-Grau E. Continuous serratus anterior plane block provides analgesia in multiple rib fractures: A case report. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2019;69:87-90.
Bossolasco M, Bernardi E, Fenoglio LM. Continuous serratus plane block in a patient with multiple rib fractures. J Clin Anesth 2017;38:85-6.
Jadon A, Jain P. Serratus anterior plane block-an analgesic technique for multiple rib fractures: A case series. SRL Anesth 2017;3:001-4.
Bhoi D, Selvam V, Yadav P, Talawar P. Comparison of two different techniques of serratus anterior plane block: A clinical experience. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2018;34:251-3.
] [Full text]
Ökmen K. Comparison of efficiency of serratus anterior plane block and thoracic epidural block for thoracotomy analgesia. Arch Clin Exp Med 2018;3:156-9.
Wang H, Liu Y, Ge W, Bian L, Pu L, Jiang Y, et al
. Comparison of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block perioperatively in radical mastectomy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019;99:1809-13.
Jain P, Jadon A, Motaka M. Serratus anterior plane block failed to relieve pain in multiple fractured ribs: Report of two cases. J Recent Adv Pain 2017;3:50-3.
Johnston DF, Black ND, O'Halloran R, Turbitt LR, Taylor SJ. Cadaveric findings of the effect of rib fractures on spread of serratus plane injections. Can J Anaesth 2019;66:738-9.
Rose P, Ramlogan R, Madden S, Lui A. Serratus anterior plane block home catheter for posterior rib fractures and flail chest. Can J Anaesth 2019;66:997-8.
Dr. Tej Prakash Sinha
Department of Emergency Medicine, JPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||“All India Institute of Medical Sciences Traumatic Rib Fracture Acute Pain Management” (AIIMS TRAP) Algorithm for Pain-Free Experience in Chest Injury Patients
| ||Sanjeev Kumar Bhoi, Brunda RL, Sakshi Yadav, Dipanjan Halder, Tej Prakash Sinha |
| ||Indian Journal of Surgery. 2022; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Effect of Erector Spinae Block versus Serratus Plane Block on Pain Scores and Diaphragmatic Excursion in Multiple Rib Fractures. A Prospective Randomized Trial
| ||Dina Ahmed El Malla, Rehab Abd El fattah Helal, Tamer Atef Mohamed Zidan, Mona Blough El Mourad |
| ||Pain Medicine. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Comparison of ultrasonography guided serratus anterior plane block and thoracic paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized double-blind study
| ||Merve Sena Baytar, Canan Yilmaz, Derya Karasu, Çagdas Baytar |
| ||The Korean Journal of Pain. 2021; 34(2): 234 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||2911 |
| Printed||101 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||187 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||3 |