Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:643   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 121-127

Studying the variability in patient inflow and staffing trends on Sundays versus other days in the academic emergency department


1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences, Kannur, Kerala, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences, Kannur, Kerala, India

Correspondence Address:
K T Madavan Nambiar
Department of Emergency Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences, Pariyaram, Kannur - 670 503, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_139_16

Rights and Permissions

Background: Resource limitation, staff deficiency, and variability in patient inflow contribute to emergency department (ED) overcrowding, associated with delayed care, poor care, and poor patient outcomes. This study seeks to describe and analyze patient inflow variability and staffing trends on Sundays versus other days in a tertiary academic ED from South India. Methods: Patient inflow and staffing data for 2 years were collected from hospital records, cross-checked, and statistically analyzed using Epi Info 7.0. Results: Significant increase in patient inflow (45.6%) was noted on Sundays compared to other days (155.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 152.75–159.05] vs. 107.1 [95% CI: 105.98–108.22]; P< 0.001), with higher inflow in the morning shifts (67.4 [95% CI: 65.41–69.45] vs. 32.1 [95% CI: 31.45–32.70]; P< 0.001). All categories of ED staff were deficient across all shifts (2.1 [95% CI: 2.05–2.15] tier-2 physicians, 4.9 [95% CI: 4.86–4.94] nurses, and 1.9 [95% CI: 1.88–1.92] nurse assistants on an average), especially tier-1 physicians (0.3 [95% CI: 0.24–0.36] on Sundays and 0.5 [95% CI: 0.48–0.52] on other days; P< 0.001). Patient-per-hour (PPH)-per-provider based on patient arrival rate was generally high. PPH per tier-1 physician was the highest, being 10.6 (95% CI: 9.95–11.14) versus 5.4 (95% CI: 5.26–5.59; P< 0.001) in the morning and 7.2 (95% CI: 6.95–7.45) versus 6.6 (95% CI: 6.43–6.74; P = 0.08) in the evening shifts on Sundays and other days, respectively. Conclusions: There were deficiencies in all categories of ED staff on all days, and this was pronounced on Sundays due to significantly higher patient inflow. Inadequate ED staffing, especially due to a significant dearth of tier-1 physicians is a pointer toward quality compromise in developing EDs. Authors recommend adequate staff deployment in developing EDs for optimum quality care. This should be implemented such that staffing is based on expected patient inflow so that a PPH-per-provider goal of 2.5 is targeted across all shifts.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2597    
    Printed68    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal