Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:712   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 198-202
Injury patterns and outcomes of trauma in the geriatric population presenting to the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital of South India


1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of General Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission01-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance18-Jun-2019
Date of Web Publication27-Aug-2019
 

   Abstract 


Background: The geriatric population is more prone for injuries with complications due to their associated comorbidities. This study was done to understand the mode, severity, and outcome of injuries among geriatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included all patients >60 years who presented with trauma between October 2014 and March 2015. Details of the incident, injuries, and hospital outcome were noted. Results: Among 8563 geriatric patients, who presented to the ED during the study, 427 (4.9%) patients were trauma related. The mean age was 69 (standard deviation: 6.76) years with 87.6% being young-old (60–79 years) and 12.4% being old-old (>80 years). Majority (63.2%) were Priority 2 patients. The median time between the incident and ED arrival among Priority 1 patients was 3 h (interquartile range: 2–5). Common modes of injuries were slip and fall (37.4%), two-wheeler accidents (25.8%), fall from height (9.1%), and pedestrian (8.9%). The ED team alone managed 25.8% of patients. Specialty departments referred to included orthopedics (48%), neurosurgery (18.3%), plastic surgery (4.2%), HLRS (4%), and others. Injuries due to slip and fall were significantly more among the old-old (P = 0.001), and two-wheeler accidents were more among the young-old (P = 0.001), respectively. Superficial head injuries (28.8%), extremity (24.8%), facial (18.7%), and traumatic brain injuries (17.8%) were common presentations. Thoracic injuries were significantly more among the old-old (P < 0.001). Half (46.3%) of the young-old were discharged stable (P = 0.017). In-hospital mortality rate was 0.7% (3/427), while 12.9% (55/427) left against medical advice due to poor prognosis. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the pattern of injury seen in the elderly in an urban setting in India. From this, we perceive the need for a prospective study evaluating the causes for geriatric trauma, which would help work on ways to prevent and minimize injuries in the elderly.

Keywords: Accidents, emergency department, geriatric, injury patterns, trauma

How to cite this article:
Abhilash KP, Tephilah R, Pradeeptha S, Gunasekaran K, Chandy GM. Injury patterns and outcomes of trauma in the geriatric population presenting to the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital of South India. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2019;12:198-202

How to cite this URL:
Abhilash KP, Tephilah R, Pradeeptha S, Gunasekaran K, Chandy GM. Injury patterns and outcomes of trauma in the geriatric population presenting to the emergency department in a tertiary care hospital of South India. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 21];12:198-202. Available from: http://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2019/12/3/198/265387





   Introduction Top


Trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries. Emergency departments (EDs) and trauma centers across the country need to be prepared with adequate resources to handle the increasing number of trauma victims. Elderly trauma victims pose a unique challenge with multiple comorbidities and a lesser tolerance to sudden physical trauma.[1] It is difficult to accurately determine the severity of injury and physiological derangement because of differences in biology due to advanced age. Hence, it is important to understand the injury profile of this special age group to be better prepared to handle emergencies.[2] Lifestyle of the geriatric population in a developing country with predominantly consanguineal family units is very different from the western world where families are generally nuclear, and the elderly are independent.[3],[4],[5] Although injury pattern among the elderly is described in literature from the west, there exists minimal data from the developing countries. Therefore, we undertook this study was to improve the understanding of the mode of trauma in the geriatric population, severity of injuries, and outcome in our hospital so that effective prevention and comprehensive management strategies could be made.[6],[7] We also studied the accuracy of physiologic variables such as respiratory rate, Glasco coma scale (GCS), and systolic blood pressure which are used in the revised trauma score (RTS) in predicting mortality.[8],[9],[10],[11]


   Materials and Methods Top


The retrospective study was done in the adult ED of Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore, which is a 45 bedded department in South India with an average of 200 admissions daily. We recruited all patients more than 60 years of age who presented to the ED with trauma between October 2014 and March 2015. The inclusion criteria were all patients who had sustained trauma through road traffic accidents (RTA), industrial incidents, electrical injuries, fall from height or level ground, or trauma related to assault, sports, and animals. Patients aged below 60 years presenting with trauma and adult patients who were dead on arrival were excluded from the study.

Data of the patients were obtained from the electronic hospital records. Details of history and physical examination findings of all patients were recorded on a standard data collection sheet. The following were extracted: demographics, mode of injury, time of injury and time of presentation, triage priority, severity of injury, type of injury, and proportion of patients requiring admission. The triage priority level was defined as follows:

  1. Triage Priority 1: Patient with airway, breathing or circulation compromise, or head injury with GCS <8
  2. Triage Priority 2: Patient with stable airway, breathing, and circulation with long-bone injuries, dislocations, stable abdomino-thoracic injuries, head injury with GCS 9 or more
  3. Triage Priority 3: Hemodynamically stable patients with minor trauma.


All patients had routine blood investigations and relevant radiological tests based on the initial primary and secondary surveys. The severity of injury was assessed using the RTS. The region of the body affected was noted, and injuries were classified as superficial and deep. All abrasions, superficial lacerations, and minor soft-tissue injuries were considered as superficial injuries. All penetrating injuries, fractures, dislocations, head injuries, and other internal organ injuries were classified as deep injuries. After initial stabilization by the ED team, the patients were handed over to the necessary surgical departments for further management if necessary. Patients with minor injuries were discharged by the ED team after a short observation period and those who required surgery or prolonged observation were admitted to the respective wards. In-hospital outcome of all the admitted patients was noted.

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Released 2007, version 16.0. Chicago, USA). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) or median (interquartile range) was calculated for the continuous variables and t-test or Mann–Whitney test was used to test the significance. The categorical variables were expressed in proportion, and Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare dichotomous variables. Univariate analysis was performed to identify the differences between the young-old (60–80 years) and the old-old (>80 years) age groups. For all tests, a two-sided P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB), and patient confidentiality was maintained using unique identifiers and by password protected data entry software with restricted users.


   Results Top


During the study, the ED attended to 32,952 patients with 26% (8563) in the geriatric age group (>60 years). Among these 8563 geriatric patients, 427 (5%) were trauma related. Only 12.4% were in the old-old (>80 years) age group [Figure 1]. The baseline characteristics, including comorbidities, triage priority level, and the time of presentation since the time of injury are shown in [Table 1]. The mean age was 69 (SD: 6.76) years. There was a male predominance (59.1%). Of the RTA, 76.8% were in elderly men. 59.3% of patients who slipped and fell were women. Injuries due to slip and fall were significantly more among the old-old (P = 0.001), and two-wheeler accidents were more among the young-old (P = 0.001). Majority (63.2%) were Priority 2 patients. The median time between the incident and ED arrival was the shortest for Priority 1 patients (3 h [interquartile range: 2–5]).
Figure 1: Region of injury and triage priority level

Click here to view
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of geriatric patients with trauma presenting to the emergency department

Click here to view


Common modes of injuries were RTAs (41.9%), fall on level ground (37.4%), and fall from a height (9.1%) [Table 2]. Comparison of the examination findings, mode of injury, and the region of the body involved between the young-old and the old-old is shown in [Table 3]. The severity of injury was calculated by the RTS with a mean of 7.63. RTS score of <5 was seen in only six patients. Seventeen patients (0.04%) presented with a systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg. Three hundred and ninety-three (92%) of them were found to be tachypneic at presentation. The patients' sensorium was assessed at presentation, and 85.7% of them were found to have a normal Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Mild head injury (GSC of 13 and 14) was seen in 0.06%, 0.05% suffered from a moderate head injury (GCS between 8 and 13), and 0.03% had a severe head injury (GCS of <8).
Table 2: Mode of injury (n=427)

Click here to view
Table 3: Comparison of young-old and old-old patients on arrival to the emergency department

Click here to view


A quarter of the patients were managed solely by the ED team. Based on the injuries noted, the patients were referred to specialties for further management of injuries. Orthopedics (48%), neurosurgery (18.3%), plastic surgery (4.2%), and hand surgery (4%) were the main units involved [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Departments involved

Click here to view


For stabilization, some patients needed intubation. Three were intubated from outside before admission to our hospital, 31 were intubated in our ED.

In-hospital mortality rate was 0.7%, while 12.9% left against medical advice due to poor prognosis.


   Discussion Top


Trauma is a major problem in India with severe and wide-ranging consequences for individuals and society as a whole. Geriatric population is growing internationally and more recently in India. It has become increasingly difficult for them to access the medical services provided to the general public by hospitals. Hence, there is a need for studies to evaluate the common emergencies with which they present, so that, better quality care can be given to them. As of now, only a small percentage of patients that present with trauma are of the geriatric age group, but there is a foreseen exponential increase because of the general improvement in quality of life of the elderly. As medical facilities increase and national health-care improves, the need to evaluate the requirements of this specific group of people, who are different from the pediatric and the normal adult population has been identified. Most studies done for the evaluation of diseases do not include the geriatric population as they are old, frail, and unable to make decisions on their own and have many comorbidities.[12] Hence, the data generated on the management of these people is very sparse as compared to that in the other populations, making it difficult for the physicians to give them quality care. Thus, there is a resultant rise in unnecessary procedures done and in-hospital stay.[13]

In this study, we considered people above the age of 60 years as the geriatric population and classified them as young-old and old-old with their mean ages being 66.9 + 5.38 years and 84.28 + 4.05 years, respectively. Their comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and stroke were considered. We found a male prevalence of 60%. In our study, three-fourth of RTA were in men. A study done in Ontario shows a different ratio, with RTA being 65% in men and 34% in women.[7] We noted in our ED that more women suffered from fall at level ground, while more men were a part of the RTA. Hence, we presume this is because in the Indian Society, elderly women spend most of their time at home. There have been studies done in the West, which show that hypothermia, fall, and cardiovascular problems are the major causes of geriatric emergency.[8],[14] Complications such as aspiration pneumonia, cardiovascular, and respiratory sequelae were seen in some patients. In our study, the largest percentage was reported to be due to slip and fall, followed by two-wheeler injuries and fall from height.

The analysis was done using a simple RTS, which has been shown to correlate well with mortality.[15] The RTS is a physiological scoring system, with a high inter-rater reliability.[16] In our study, very few patients presented with a very low RTS of six and below. We postulate that because we are a tertiary care center, some of the very severe trauma where mortality is in a few hours may not have reached our center in time. Most other patients would have received first aid at a local center, and hence, the RTS is relatively higher at presentation to our ED.

In a tertiary center such as CMC, primary care, and triaging were done by the ED, and the patients were referred to the respective departments for specific care. ED alone managed about a quarter of the cases whereas the maximum numbers of cases were seen by the orthopedics department followed by neurosurgery since fracture head of the femur and traumatic brain injury and head injuries were the most common presentations.

There have been very few studies, in India, which look at the outcome of geriatric trauma. A study in the Chinese population aged above 60 years in 2012, i.e., in about 14.3% of the population, showed the prevalence of trauma to be 8.5%.[14] They observed that there was a higher rate of mortality in this geriatric population. In our study, we compared the results among the young-old and old-old and found that almost half of the young-old was discharged stable.

A limitation was that our study was conducted in a single center, and hence, the patient population may be biased by patient selection and referral pattern. Since this was a retrospective survey, some data were missing.

Our study highlights the burden of geriatric trauma in the EDs of India. It gives us an idea of the difference in the mode of injury, presentation, severity, and outcome. Through this, we see the need for addressing the elderly under a separate bracket with respect to health care, including trauma. As our country grows, the older population will also grow, and hence the need to cater to their different problems effectively.


   Conclusion Top


Our study demonstrates the pattern of injury seen in the elderly presenting to the ED from an urban population of India. It shows the differences between the young-old and the old-old age groups. From this, we perceive the need for a prospective study evaluating the causes for geriatric trauma, which would help work on ways to prevent and minimize injuries in the elderly.

Research quality and ethics statement

The authors of this manuscript declare that this scientific work complies with reporting quality, formatting, and reproducibility guidelines set forth by enhancing the quality and transparency of health research network. The authors also attest that this clinical investigation was determined to require IRB/Ethics Committee Review, and the corresponding protocol/approval number is IRB Min. No. 10219 dated 08.08.2016. We also certify that we have not plagiarized the contents in this submission and have done a plagiarism check.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Devas MB. Geriatric orthopaedics. Br Med J 1974;1:190-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Salvi F, Morichi V, Grilli A, Giorgi R, De Tommaso G, Dessì-Fulgheri P. The elderly in the emergency department: A critical review of problems and solutions. Intern Emerg Med 2007;2:292-301.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Federspiel C, Keipes M. Geriatrics from the 19th to the 21st century 150 years of geriatric medicine: From increasing life expectancy to improving quality of life for the very old. Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb 2014. p. 69-78.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Schroll M. Research on aging: Geriatric perspectives. Ugeskr Laeger 1992;154:2889-95.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rich MW, Chyun DA, Skolnick AH, Alexander KP, Forman DE, Kitzman DW, et al. Knowledge gaps in cardiovascular care of the older adult population: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society. Circulation 2016;133:2103-22.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kara H, Bayir A, Ak A, Akinci M, Tufekci N, Degirmenci S, et al. Trauma in elderly patients evaluated in a hospital emergency department in Konya, Turkey: A retrospective study. Clin Interv Aging 2014;9:17-21.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gowing R, Jain MK. Injury patterns and outcomes associated with elderly trauma victims in Kingston, Ontario. Can J Surg 2007;50:437-44.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Wilson MS, Konda SR, Seymour RB, Karunakar MA; Carolinas Trauma Network Research Group. Early predictors of mortality in geriatric patients with trauma. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30:e299-304.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Brown JB, Gestring ML, Forsythe RM, Stassen NA, Billiar TR, Peitzman AB, et al. Systolic blood pressure criteria in the national trauma triage protocol for geriatric trauma: 110 is the new 90. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;78:352-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Rau CS, Lin TS, Wu SC, Yang JC, Hsu SY, Cho TY, et al. Geriatric hospitalizations in fall-related injuries. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2014;22:63.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Betz ME, Ginde AA, Southerland LT, Caterino JM. Emergency department and outpatient treatment of acute injuries in older adults in the United States: 2009-2010. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014;62:1317-23.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wang H, Coppola M, Robinson RD, Scribner JT, Vithalani V, de Moor CE, et al. Geriatric trauma patients with cervical spine fractures due to ground level fall: Five years experience in a level one trauma center. J Clin Med Res 2013;5:75-83.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hsia RY, Wang E, Saynina O, Wise P, Pérez-Stable EJ, Auerbach A. Factors associated with trauma center use for elderly patients with trauma: A statewide analysis, 1999-2008. Arch Surg 2011;146:585-92.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Aschkenasy MT, Rothenhaus TC. Trauma and falls in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2006;24:413-32, vii.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA, Flanagan ME, et al. Arevision of the trauma score. J Trauma 1989;29:623-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Dries DJ. Traumatic shock and tissue hypoperfusion: Nonsurgical management. In: Critical Care Medicine. 3rd ed. New Jersey:Elsevier; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 16
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Gina Maryann Chandy
Department of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 632 004, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_79_18

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed169    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal