Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:781   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 170-174
Patterns of zygomatic complex bone fracture in Saudi Arabia


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Najran Regional Specialty Dental Centre, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission02-Feb-2018
Date of Acceptance09-Jul-2018
Date of Web Publication01-Oct-2018
 

   Abstract 


Introduction: Zygomatic bone (ZB), also known as the cheekbone, articulates with the maxilla, temporal sphenoid, and the frontal bones. It forms the prominence of the cheek and part of the orbit, and because of its prominence, it is susceptible to trauma. The aim of this study was to present the pattern of ZB fracture in a country in the Middle East. Patients and Methods: The medical records of all trauma cases admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Ward, Riyadh Dental Centre, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were reviewed and all cases with ZB fractures were included in this study from December 2002 to December 2012. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results were presented as simple frequencies and percentages. Results: A total of 1487 patients had maxillofacial trauma and 306 cases were diagnosed with ZB fractures during the study. There were 271 (88.6%) males and 35 (11.4%) females with male: female ratio of 7.7:1. Age group of 21–30 years has the highest number of fracture cases (133 [43.5%]). Road traffic accident (RTA) remained the leading etiology of zygomatic complex fracture (ZMCF; 221 [72.2%]). August has been observed to be associated with the highest cases of ZMCF (40 [13.1%]). The years 2005 and 2006 recorded the highest frequency of ZMCF cases (46 [15.0%] and 44 [14.4%], respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that RTA is the leading cause of ZB fractures followed by assaults. The most commonly fractured site was the zygomaticomaxillary. Proper road traffic regulation is paramount to help reduce maxillofacial trauma.

Keywords: Etiology, maxillofacial, trauma, zygomatic bone

How to cite this article:
Ali-Alsuliman D, Ibrahim EH, Braimah RO. Patterns of zygomatic complex bone fracture in Saudi Arabia. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2018;11:170-4

How to cite this URL:
Ali-Alsuliman D, Ibrahim EH, Braimah RO. Patterns of zygomatic complex bone fracture in Saudi Arabia. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 May 27];11:170-4. Available from: http://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2018/11/3/170/242520





   Introduction Top


The zygomatic bone (ZB) plays a key role in the structure, function, and esthetic appearance of the facial skeleton.[1] It provides standard cheek contour and separates the orbital contents from the temporal fossa and the maxillary antrum.[2]

The zygomatic complex fracture (ZMCF) formerly referred to as a tripod or trimalar fracture is now known as a quadripod or quadramalar fracture because it has four components: the zygomaticofrontal suture superiorly along the lateral orbital wall, zygomaticosphenoid suture inferiorly, zygomaticomaxillary suture separating the zygoma from the maxilla, and zygomaticotemporal at the zygomatic arch separating it from the temporal bone.[3]

Most zygomatico–orbito–maxillary complex fractures are caused by violent assaults, followed by motor vehicle accidents; the majority of patients affected and reported in the literature were young males in their third decade of life.[4],[5] Abdullah et al.[6] have reported that the patterns of maxillofacial trauma in Saudi Arabia are poorly studied. Most middle-third facial fractures involved the zygomatic complex, and the incidence of such fractures differs significantly between male and female.[6] Successful management and treatment of ZMCF depends on the careful study of the pattern of fracture in any community. Saudi Arabia is peculiar because of restriction on female movement and driving and the introduction of new traffic regulations that may modify pattern and treatment of facial injuries. This treatment requires an accurate diagnosis, appropriate surgical exposure, and precise reduction to reconstitute the complex three-dimensional anatomy. The aim of the current study, therefore, is to find out the pattern of ZMCF in an Arabian community over a 10-year period.


   Patients and Methods Top


The medical records of all cases admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Ward, Riyadh Dental Centre, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were reviewed and all cases diagnosed with ZMCF were included in this study. The data studied were obtained retrospectively from clinical case sheets and surgical records over a 10-year period starting from December 2002 to December 2012. Patient's gender, age, nationality, etiology, and site of ZMCF were recorded. Ethical committee approval of the institution was obtained for the study with protocol number GRP/43236002/38.

Inclusion criteria involve all patients diagnosed clinically and radiographically suffering from ZMCF that presented from December 2002 to December 2012. Exclusion criteria included patients with maxillofacial injuries or body injuries not associated with ZB involvement, patients admitted under other specialties such as neurosurgery and orthopedic because of the inaccurate maxillofacial diagnostic records in these departments, incomplete or unclear patient records, and cases in which computed tomography showed no evidence of fracture.

Data were stored and statistically analyzed using SPSS (ver. 16.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results were presented as simple frequencies and percentages.


   Results Top


A total number of 1487 patients were admitted for maxillofacial injuries, and of these, 306 cases were treated for ZMCF. This represents about 20.6% of the total maxillofacial trauma cases during the study. There were 271 (88.6%) male patients and 35 (11.4%) females with male: female ratio of 7.7:1. Of the 271 males, 233 (86%) patients were Saudis while 38 (14%) patients were non-Saudis. Of the 35 females, 30 (85.7%) patients were Saudis while only 5 (14.3%) patients were non-Saudis [Table 1]. Age group of 21–30 years had the highest number of fracture cases (133 [43.5%]), while patients >50 years of age had the least number of fractured cases [Table 2]. Road traffic accident (RTA) remained the leading etiology of ZMCF in the hospital (221 [72.2%]), followed by assault (54 [17.6%]). Least fractures were due to camel attack (4 [1.3%]) [Table 2].
Table 1: Nationality and gender distribution of the studied patients

Click here to view
Table 2: Etiology of Zygomatic bone fracture according to patient's age group

Click here to view


August has been observed to be associated with the highest cases of ZMCF (40 [13.1%]) and closely followed by July (33 [10.8%]). February recorded the least number of ZMCF (17 [5.6%]) [Figure 1]. Throughout the study, 2005 and 2006 recorded the highest frequency of ZMCF cases (46 [15.0%] and 44 [14.4%], respectively). The year 2012 recorded the least cases (17 [5.2%]) [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Bar chart showing distribution of zygomatic complex fracture during the months of the year

Click here to view
Figure 2: Bar chart showing distribution of zygomatic complex fracture during the study years

Click here to view


ZMCF is the most common fracture pattern observed in the current study with 283 (92.5%) patients followed by isolated zygomatic arch fracture 20 (6.5%) [Table 3]. Only 2 (0.6%) cases of combined fracture were observed in the study. The left and right sides were affected equally in the current study (140 [45.8%] and 141 [46.1%], respectively). Only 25 (8.2%) cases occurred bilaterally [Figure 3].
Table 3: Pattern of zygomatic bone fracture and age group of patients

Click here to view
Figure 3: Pie chart showing the laterality of the zygomatic complex fractures

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Due to the morphologic prominence of the zygomatic region, ZMCF is the second most common mid-maxillofacial bone fractured.[7] Overall, it represents 13% of all craniofacial fractures.[7],[8] However, ZMCF in this study represents 20.5% of the total number of maxillofacial trauma cases seen during the studied. This is far higher than that reported in the literature. The reason for this higher percentage is as a result of higher incidence of RTA in this region of the world.[6]

The Saudi nationals represent the main group of patients affected as compared to non-Saudi citizens. This is not in agreement with a study done in the United Arab Emirates where the non-Emirates patients were higher than the Emirates.[9] This may be due to the fact that the Riyadh Dental Centre has some restriction policy of accepting non-Saudi patients as compared to other Arab nations. Studies have shown that the peak incidences of maxillofacial fractures in rural children were found to be between the ages of 10 and 15 years.[10],[11] However, in the present study, the age group most frequently involved in ZMCF was found to be 21–30 years (43.5%) followed by 11–20 years (28.8%). This may be attributed to the fact that individuals in the third decade of life are more physically active in Saudi Arabia. This finding has been reported in other studies.[12],[13]

Males (88.6%) are affected with ZMCF more than females (11.4%) because women are not allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia and are therefore less susceptible to accidents, assaults, work, and sport injuries as found in other studies.[13],[14],[15],[16] The etiology of maxillofacial injuries varies from one country to another and even within the same country depending on the socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental factors.[6],[17] Within the same country, periodic verification of the etiology of maxillofacial injuries helps recommend ways to prevent maxillofacial injuries.[17],[18] Fights and assaults were the predominant cause of maxillofacial injuries reported in some studies;[19],[20] however, in this study, the most common cause of ZMCF was RTAs (72.2%). These figures match with the findings of other researches from different communities on the most common etiological factor of RTAs.[12],[16],[21],[22],[23] On the contrary, Gomes et al.[24] showed that falls were the main cause of injuries in their study. Similarly, falls have been reported as the main etiological cause of craniomaxillofacial injuries in females among Arabs in Israel.[25] This current finding may be due to nonenforcement of road traffic laws as many drivers exceed the speed limit, do not use seat belts, and drive under the influence of psychoactive substances.[26],[27] Fastening of seat belts resulted in a decrease in the frequency of injury among car users as reported in the literature.[28],[29] Interpersonal violence was reported as the next most frequent cause of ZMCF in different studies.[28],[30],[31],[32] This is consistent with the findings of this study where assaults involved 54 (17.6%) cases. In contrast to our study, falls were reported more frequent than violence by a study in the United Arab Emirates.[33] This could be explained by the presence of high sky buildings in the United Arab Emirates as compared with Saudi Arabia. Fall from height was the third highest cause of zygoma fractures in this study, followed by sport injuries. It was also surprising that camel assault was found to be a cause of ZMCF in Saudi Arabia. This etiological factor has not been reported in previous studies from the region. However, in Northern Nigeria, camels are used for transportation and farming.[34] These animals pull ploughs, assist in irrigation of farmlands, and transport agricultural produce.[34] Maxillofacial injuries from camel aggression have been reported in this part of Nigeria.[35],[36]

The monthly incidence of maxillofacial fractures from this study was fairly constant with seasonal variations, as reported in several studies.[37],[38] During this 10-year retrospective study, it appeared that August showed the highest month during which ZMCF was diagnosed, while February showed the lowest number of fracture diagnosed in the same period. This is in accordance with a study from an Indian community where most cases were diagnosed in August.[10] This was however different from those reported in an country in Arab where the peak incidence reported was in January followed by May.[9] This may be explained by the fact that August is the summer holiday at school and universities in Saudi Arabia and supported by the finding that the highest age group diagnosed with fractures are seen between 20 and 30 years. The highest incidence of fractures was reported during 2005 which declined during the following years. This could be related to the implementation of tough traffic regulation and the commencement of SAHER system.[39] This system is an automated traffic control system in Saudi Arabia which is a complete and well-equipped network of digital cameras and online monitoring system linked with the National Information Center of the Ministry of Interior.[39] It has a strong check on traffic flow through a satellite system and has special features such as auto vehicle location, variable message signs, closed-circuit TV, law enforcement system, and traffic management system. In addition, this system needs no human resource for its functioning and works even more than a traffic warden. If there is any case of traffic violation, it issues tickets to motorist.[39] However, this finding needs further and detailed study to prove the effect of implementation of this system on the incidence of RTAs in the kingdom.

Zygomatic arch fracture often occurs as part of ZMCF;[40] however, isolated zygomatic arch fractures are uncommon. This study is in tandem with the literature as zygomatic arch fractures are very few. Probably, this may be because most impacts to the face are likely to be frontal, while arch fractures are more likely to involve lateral impact. Therefore, isolated zygomatic arch fractures are expected more in cases of assaults, falls, missiles, and other injuries.[41] The present study recorded fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex bone (92.8%) more than those of the zygomatic arch (7.2%). This is in agreement with a study form Medina, a community close to the center of the current study.[42]

This study showed that both right and left sites of zygoma are equally affected by fractures. This is in tandem with previous studies,[24] which showed no significant difference in both sides of ZB fracture. However, a few other studies have reported a higher right side predilection.[16]


   Conclusion Top


RTA is the most common cause of ZB fractures in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, followed by assaults, while the most commonly fractured site was the zygomaticomaxillary fracture. These fractures frequently occurred in the age group of 21–30 years, which reflects the peak age of activities. Proper road traffic regulations should be advocated to reduce the incidence of maxillofacial injuries.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the entire clinical and administrative staffs of the Riyadh Dental Centre for their support during the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Lin Q, Hong XY, Zhang D, Jin HJ. Preoperative evaluation and surgical technique of functional and cosmetic aspects in zygomatic complex fracture patients. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2017;31:1005-12.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Buchanan EP, Hopper RA, Suver DW, Hayes AG, Gruss JS, Birgfeld CB, et al. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures and their association with naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures: A 5-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:1296-304.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Adam AA, Zhi L, Bing LZ, Zhong Xing WU. Evaluation of treatment of zygomatic bone and zygomatic arch fractures: A retrospective study of 10 years. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2012;11:171-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Shere JL, Boole JR, Holtel MR, Amoroso PJ. An analysis of 3599 midfacial and 1141 orbital blowout fractures among 4426 United States army soldiers, 1980-2000. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:164-70.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Elarabi MS, Bataineh AB. Changing pattern and etiology of maxillofacial fractures during the civil uprising in Western Libya. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:e248-55.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Abdullah WA, Al-Mutairi K, Al-Ali Y, Al-Soghier A, Al-Shnwani A. Patterns and etiology of maxillofacial fractures in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2013;25:33-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chowdhury SR, Menon PS. Etiology and management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures in the armed forces. Med J Armed Forces India 2005;61:238-40.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Tadj A, Kimble FW. Fractured zygomas. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:49-54.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Al-Khateeb T, Abdullah FM. Craniomaxillofacial injuries in the United Arab Emirates: A retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1094-101.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Joshi SR, Saluja H, Pendyala GS, Chaudhari S, Mahindra U, Kini Y, et al. Pattern and prevalence of maxillofacial fractures in rural children of central Maharashtra, India. A retrospective study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2013;12:307-11.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Oginni FO, Fagade OO, Akinwande JA, Arole GF, Odusanya SA. Pattern of soft tissue injuries to the oro-facial region in Nigerian children attending a teaching hospital. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12:201-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Obuekwe O, Owotade F, Osaiyuwu O. Etiology and pattern of zygomatic complex fractures: A retrospective study. J Natl Med Assoc 2005;97:992-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Farias IPSE, Bernardino ÍM, Nóbrega LMD, Grempel RG, D'Avila S. Maxillofacial trauma, etiology and profile of patients: an exploratory study. Acta Ortop Bras 2017;25:258-61.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ellis E 3rd, Kittidumkerng W. Analysis of treatment for isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:386-400.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Bataineh AB. Etiology and incidence of maxillofacial fractures in the North of Jordan. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:31-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Menon S, Sinha R, Thapliyal G, Bandyopadhyay T. Management of zygomatic complex fractures in a tertiary hospital: A retrospective study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2011;10:138-41.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Ogunlewe MO, James O. Trends and characteristics of oral and maxillofacial injuries in Nigeria: A review of the literature. Head Face Med 2005;1:7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Girotto JA, MacKenzie E, Fowler C, Redett R, Robertson B, Manson PN, et al. Long-term physical impairment and functional outcomes after complex facial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:312-27.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister L. Gray's Anatomy. 37th ed. Edinburgh London, Melbourne, New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1989.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Trivellato PF, Arnez MF, Sverzut CE, Trivellato AE. A retrospective study of zygomatico-orbital complex and/or zygomatic arch fractures over a 71-month period. Dent Traumatol 2011;27:135-42.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Fasola AO, Obiechina AE, Arotiba JT. Zygomatic complex fractures at the university college hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. East Afr Med J 2002;79:137-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Chaudhry O, Isakson M, Franklin A, Maqusi S, El Amm C. Facial fractures: Pearls and perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:742e-758e.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Runci M, De Ponte FS, Falzea R, Bramanti E, Lauritano F, Cervino G, et al. Facial and orbital fractures: A Fifteen years retrospective evaluation of North East Sicily treated patients. Open Dent J 2017;11:546-56.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Gomes PP, Passeri LA, Barbosa JR. A 5-year retrospective study of zygomatico-orbital complex and zygomatic arch fractures in Sao Paulo state, Brazil. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:63-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Emodi O, Wolff A, Srouji H, Bahouth H, Noy D, Abu El Naaj I, et al. Trend and demographic characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in level I trauma center. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:471-5.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Ugboko V, Udoye C, Ndukwe K, Amole A, Aregbesola S. Zygomatic complex fractures in a suburban Nigerian population. Dent Traumatol 2005;21:70-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Iribhogbe PE, Odai ED. Driver-related risk factors in commercial motorcycle (okada) crashes in Benin city, Nigeria. Prehosp Disaster Med 2009;24:356-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Mitchell C. The health impact of intimate partner violence. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32:396-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Henderson M, Wood R. Editorial: Compulsory wearing of seat belts in New South Wales, Australia. An evaluation of its effect on vehicle occupant deaths in the first year. Med J Aust 1973;2:797-801.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Le BT, Dierks EJ, Ueeck BA, Homer LD, Potter BF. Maxillofacial injuries associated with domestic violence. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1277-83.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Hutchison IL, Magennis P, Shepherd JP, Brown AE. The BAOMS United Kingdom survey of facial injuries part 1: Aetiology and the association with alcohol consumption. British association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36:3-13.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Cook HE, Rowe M. A retrospective study of 356 midfacial fractures occurring in 225 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:574-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Al Ahmed HE, Jaber MA, Abu Fanas SH, Karas M. The pattern of maxillofacial fractures in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: A review of 230 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:166-70.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Ugboko VI, Olasoji HO, Ajike SO, Amole AO, Ogundipe OT. Facial injuries caused by animals in Northern Nigeria. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;40:433-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Taiwo AO, Awwal N, Braimah RO, Ibikunle AA. Unusual case of maxillofacial injury secondary to camel aggression and attack during phlebotomy: Report of two cases. Afr J of Truama 2016;2:27-9. doi: 10.4103/1597-1112.192848IP:197.210.172.40.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Ogunbodede EO, Arotiba JT. Camel bite injuries of the orofacial region: Report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1174-6.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Haug RH, Foss J. Maxillofacial injuries in the pediatric patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:126-34.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Haug RH, Prather J, Indresano AT. An epidemiologic survey of facial fractures and concomitant injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:926-32.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Ministry of Interior. Saher System of Traffic Regulations in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Available from: http://www.lifeinsaudiarabia.net/blog/2014/10/29/saher-system-of-traffic-regulations. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 30].  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Dai JH, Xu DD, Yang CY, Li ZB, Li Z. Treatment of sagittal fracture of the zygomatic arch root assisted by surgical navigation technology. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:1031-3.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Banks P, Brown A. Fractures of the Facial Skeleton. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Rabi AG, Khateery SM. Maxillofacial trauma in al Madina region of Saudi Arabia: A 5-year retrospective study. Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;14:10-4.  Back to cited text no. 42
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ramat Oyebunmi Braimah
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Najran Regional Specialty Dental Centre, Medical City Complex, Najran
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_12_18

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Patients and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1197    
    Printed57    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal