Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:987   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   


 
 Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 113-116
Sternal fractures and their management


Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage SG1 4AB, Hertfordshire, England

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission04-Apr-2012
Date of Acceptance07-Aug-2012
Date of Web Publication19-Apr-2013
 

   Abstract 

Sternal fractures are predominantly associated with deceleration injuries and blunt anterior chest trauma. Sternal trauma must be carefully evaluated by monitoring of vital parameters and it is of paramount importance that concomitant injuries are excluded. Nevertheless, routine admission of patients with isolated sternal fractures for observation is still common in today's practice, which is often unnecessary. This article aims to describe the prognosis, the recommended assessment and management of patients with sternal fractures, to help clinicians make an evidence-based judgment regarding the need for hospitalization.

Keywords: Fracture, management, sternum, trauma

How to cite this article:
Khoriati Aa, Rajakulasingam R, Shah R. Sternal fractures and their management. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2013;6:113-6

How to cite this URL:
Khoriati Aa, Rajakulasingam R, Shah R. Sternal fractures and their management. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 May 25];6:113-6. Available from: http://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2013/6/2/113/110763



   Introduction Top


Sternal fractures are associated with deceleration injuries and blunt anterior chest trauma (incidence of 3-6.8% in motor vehicle collisions). [1] Mechanisms of injury associated with sternal fractures are classified into either direct or indirect trauma. [2] Direct trauma include deceleration injuries and blunt anterior chest trauma. [1],[3] The introduction of seat-belt legislation and shoulder restraints has resulted in an increased frequency of these injuries. [1],[3] Direct impact sports, vehicle-to-pedestrian collisions, falls, and assaults account for the majority of the remaining cases. [4] Indirect forces may cause insufficiency fractures, stress fractures and pathological fractures. Insufficiency fractures occur spontaneously in patients with severe thoracic kyphosis and in those with osteoporosis. Elderly patients, post-menopausal women and patients on long-term steroid therapy are at particular risk. [5] Stress fractures have also been noted in athletes who undertake repetitive upper body exercise without history of acute trauma. [6]

Studies show that the current management of sternal fractures in several centers does not comply with available evidence, particularly in cases of isolated sternal fractures. [7] The purpose of this article is to describe the prognosis, the recommended assessment and investigations for patients sustaining sternal fractures, to help clinicians evaluate the need for hospital admission.


   Prognosis and Complications Top


Sternal fractures can either occur in isolation, or with other associated injuries. Prognosis is excellent for isolated sternal fractures, with most patients recovering completely over a period of weeks (average 10.4 weeks). [8] The overall mortality of sternal fractures is 0.7%. [1] However, two-thirds of sternal fractures have concomitant injuries with an associated mortality ranging from 25-45 %. [9] These injuries can be subdivided into 3 categories: i) Soft tissue injuries ii) Injuries to the chest wall and iii) Injuries to the spine, appendages and cranium. Chest wall injuries include rib fractures, flail chest and sternoclavicular dislocation. Soft tissue injuries include pneumothoraces, hemothoraces, cardiac tamponade, myocardial and pulmonary contusions, as well as injuries to the abdomen and diaphragm. [9] Thoracic spine compression fractures, as well as [4],[10] trauma to the head, neck, and extremities are also common. There is a significant correlation between displaced or unstable sternal fractures and pulmonary injuries, pericardial effusions, spinal and rib fractures. [11]

Complications following sternal fractures include short and long term sequelae. Short term complications include chest pain post-injury, which has a mean duration of 8 to 12 weeks for all age groups. [8] It is the predominant symptom post-injury in patients with isolated sternal fractures, with more than two-thirds of patients requiring management with analgesia alone. [11] Apprehension due to pain can impair ventilation, predisposing to chest infection. This is due to the involvement of the sternum in all motions of the chest cage, particularly those involving respiration and coughing. Long term complications include non-union, and painful pseudarthrosis may occur with the development of a false joint or overlap deformities. This may require surgical correction. [12] Predisposing factors for delayed or impaired union include advanced age, osteoporosis, diabetes, and corticosteroid therapy. Contributing factors include mechanical and anatomical factors such as instability and poor bone-to-bone contact. Abnormalities in calcium, vitamin D, and parathyroid hormone may also impact fracture healing due to their vital role in bone metabolism. [13] Rare sequelae of sternal fractures include osteomyelitis, sternal abscess and mediastinitis. Risk factors for a post-traumatic mediastinal abscess include hematoma formation, intravenous drug abuse, and a staphylococcal infection source [Table 1]a-b. [14]
Table 1:

Click here to view



   Investigations Top


A lateral chest radiograph remains the gold standard investigation in diagnosing sternal fractures, as the fracture and any displacement or dislocation occurs in the sagittal plane. [20] An antero-posterior chest radiograph is useful in detecting concomitant injuries, which include rib fractures, pulmonary contusions, and hemothoraces/pneumothoraces, as well as a widened mediastinum which may be indicative of other coexistent pathology [Table 2]a. [21] The detection of any of the former warrants further investigation by multi-slice spiral CT. Axial CT is considered to be inferior to radiography for sternal fracture diagnosis, as CT cuts may miss transverse sternal fractures. [22] Ultrasonography detects sternal fractures with equal sensitivity as plain radiography, or may be considered diagnostically superior. [23] Limiting factors including inter-operator variability, render it less acceptable as the first-line imaging modality. It is superior in the detection of rib fractures and pleural effusions; however it cannot identify the degree of fracture displacement. [24] While bone scintigraphy is superior diagnostically, and will identify fractures missed in plain radiographs, [25] it is not widely available.
Table 2:

Click here to view


Pulse oximetry should be obtained on clinical presentation, as well as serial electrocardiograms, observing for features indicative of myocardial contusion. These include an unexplained sinus tachycardia, arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, or ST-segment changes. [2] Echocardiography should be considered in patients with other concomitant injuries. [26] It provides a direct view of wall motion abnormalities, and is considered an excellent tool in the detection of acute myocardial contusion [Table 2]b. [27],[28] In patients with painful chest wall injuries transthoracic echocardiographic access may be limited. In these patients, transoesophageal echocardiography is recommended, as well as in cases of suspected lesions to the great vessels or if the transthoracic images are suboptimal. [28],[29] If myocardial contusion is suspected, cardiac biomarkers must be measured. [30] A poor correlation has been reported between elevated CK-MB and cardiac sequelae. [31] Serum cardiac troponins (troponin I and T) have been found to be highly specific to myocardial injury. [32] The optimal timing of blood sampling for troponin assays has not yet been determined to diagnose a cardiac contusion. If troponin I or T concentrations are within reference ranges on admission, a second measurement after 4-6 hrs is necessary to reliably exclude myocardial injury. [33]


   Management Top


In the acute setting, the patient should initially be resuscitated according to ATLS guidelines. [34] This involves establishing a patent airway and cervical spine control if injury is suspected. The patient's breathing and circulation should be assessed, and any life-threatening conditions should be identified and immediately treated during the primary survey. These include tension pneumothorax, massive hemothorax, open pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade and flail chest [Table 3]. [34],[35] The patient's Glasgow Coma Scale score should be assessed, as well as the neurovascular status of the upper limbs if a sternal fracture is suspected. Finally, the patient should be exposed to check for any bruising, bleeding or injuries elsewhere. The secondary survey includes obtaining a history from the patient, or a collateral source focusing on events leading to injury and on the past medical and drug history. The head, spine, back and extremities should be examined for trauma. Chest injuries identified on secondary survey include rib fractures, pulmonary contusion, simple pneumothorax, simple hemothorax, blunt aortic injury, and blunt myocardial injury [Table 3].
Table 3: Signs of associated complications which may be elicited on physical examination[34,35]

Click here to view


Patients with sternal fractures present with acute sternal pain, aggravated by deep breathing and coughing, associated with localized tenderness and signs of respiratory insufficiency. These include tachypnea, cyanosis, and the use of accessory muscles for ventilation. Inspection of the anterior chest wall may show ecchymosis or contusion with or without a step deformity. Palpation may reveal a fracture related crepitus. [35]

The required investigations for suspected sternal fractures should be ordered. The degree of fracture displacement should be ascertained, as complete displacement is associated with serious cardiac or pulmonary injury. [20] Hemodynamically unstable patients, those with suspected myocardial contusion, or those with ECG findings indicative of it, should be evaluated with biomarkers of cardiac injury, echocardiography and continuous monitoring. ICU admission (if unstable) may also be necessary. [30] Patients with suspected myocardial contusion include those with anterior chest wall ecchymosis, sternal tenderness, complaints of sternal or substernal chest pain, as well as deformity. [30] Stable patients with isolated sternal fractures, a normal ECG and cardiac enzymes, are expected to have a benign course, and can be discharged home with analgesics and follow-up within the first 24 hrs. [36]

Operative fixation may be indicated for displaced or unstable fractures. These may cause debilitating chest pain or be associated with flail chest, compromising pulmonary or cardiac function. Sternal fixation can be effectively performed using sternal wires or formal osteosynthesis using plate and screws. [37],[38],[39]


   Conclusion Top


Sternal fractures are not uncommon injuries. They may be associated with major injuries to thoracic organs, with potentially fatal sequelae. In the acute setting, management includes resuscitation according to ATLS guidelines, and treatment of any coexistent injuries. After exclusion of other concomitant injuries, patients with isolated sternal fractures can be safely discharged home within the first 24 hrs, provided cardiac enzymes (troponin) and ECG findings are normal. Routine hospital admission is therefore unnecessary for all patients with sternal fractures, and is warranted in those with significant associated injuries. Other factors which may justify hospitalization include major co-morbidities, high-impact trauma, severely displaced fractures, inadequate pain control, or insufficient domestic support.[40]

 
   References Top

1.Brookes JG, Dunn RJ, Rogers IR. Sternal fractures: A retrospective analysis of 272 cases. J Trauma 1993;35:46-54.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.De Tarnowsky G. VII. Contrecoup fracture of the sternum. Ann Surg 1905;41:252-64.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Hills MW, Delprado AM, Deane SA. Sternal fractures: Associated injuries and management. J Trauma 1993;35:55-60.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Knobloch K, Wagner S, Haasper C, Probst C, Krettek C, Otte D, et al. Sternal fractures occur most often in old cars to seat-belted drivers without any airbag often with concomitant spinal injuries: Clinical findings and technical collision variables among 42,055 crash victims. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:444-50.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Horikawa A, Miyakoshi N, Kodama H, Shimada Y. Insufficiency fracture of the sternum simulating myocardial infarction: Case report and review of the literature. Tohoku J Exp Med 2007;211:89-93.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Robertsen K, Kristensen O, Vejen L. Manubrium sterni stress fracture: An unusual complication of non-contact sport. Br J Sports Med 1996;30:176-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Hossain M, Ramavath A, Kulangara J, Andrew JG. Current management of isolated sternal fractures in the UK: Time for evidence based practice? A cross-sectional survey and review of literature. Injury 2010;41:495-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.de Oliveira M, Hassan TB, Sebewufu R, Finlay D, Quinton DN. Long-term morbidity in patients suffering a sternal fracture following discharge from the A and E department. Injury 1998;29:609-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Beck RJ, Pollak AN, Rahm SJ. Thoracic trauma. Intermediate emergency care and transportation of the sick and injured. Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Holderman HH. Fracture and dislocation of the sternum: Report of three cases. Ann Surg 1928;88:252-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Roy-Shapira A, Levi I, Khoda J. Sternal fractures: A red flag or a red herring? J Trauma 1994;37:59-61.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Grosse A, Grosse C, Steinbach L, Anderson S. MRI findings of prolonged post-traumatic sternal pain. Skeletal Radiol 2007;36:423-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Barnes GL, Kakar S, Vora S, Morgan EF, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA. Stimulation of fracture-healing with systemic intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:120-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Cuschieri J, Kralovich KA, Patton JH, Horst HM, Obeid FN, Karmy-Jones R. Anterior mediastinal abscess after closed sternal fracture. J Trauma 1999;47:551-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Liman ST, Kuzucu A, Tastepe AI, Ulasan GN, Topcu S. Chest injury due to blunt trauma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:374.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Gaillard M, Herne C, Mandin, Raynaud P. Mortality prognosis factors in chest injury. J Trauma 1990;30:93-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Ciraulo DL, Elliott D, Mitchell KA, Rodriguez A. Flail chest as a marker for significant injuries. J Am Coll Surg 1994;178:466-70.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Mirvis SE. Diagnostic imaging of acute thoracic injury. Semin ultrasound CT MR 2004;25:156-79.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Dee PM. The radiology of the chest trauma. Rad Clin North Am 1992;30:291-306.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.von Garrel T, Ince A, Junge A, Schnabel M, Bahrs C. The sternal fracture: Radiographic analysis of 200 fractures with special reference to concomitant injuries. J Trauma 2004;57:837-44.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Saab M, Kurdy NM, Birkinshaw R. Widening of the mediastinum following a sternal fracture. Int J Clin Pract 1997;51:256-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Huggett JM, Roszler MH. CT findings of sternal fracture. Injury 1998;29:623-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Jin W, Yang DM, Kim HC, Ryu KN. Diagnostic values of sonography for assessment of sternal fractures compared with conventional radiography and bone scans. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:1263-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Engin G, Yekeler E, Guloglu R, Acunas B, Acunas G. US versus conventional radiography in the diagnosis of sternal fractures. Acta Radiol 2000;41:296-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Erhan Y, Solak I, Kocabas S, Sozbilen M, Kumanlioglu K, Moral AR. The evaluation of diagnostic accordance between plain radiography and bone scintigraphy for the assessment of sternum and rib fractures in the early period of blunt trauma. Ulus Travma Derg 2001;7:242-5.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Wiener Y, Achildiev B, Karni T, Halevi A. Echocardiogram in sterna fracture. Am J Emerg Med 2001;19:403-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.King RM , Mucha P Jr, Seward JB, Gersh BJ, Farnell MB. Cardiac contusion: A new diagnostic approach utilizing two-dimensional echocardiography. J Trauma 1983;23:610-4.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Sybrandy KC, Cramer MJ, Burgersdijk C. Diagnosing cardiac contusion: Old wisdom and new insights. Heart 2003;89:485-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Karalis DG, Victor MF, Davis GA, McAllister MP, Covalesky VA, Ross JJ Jr, et al. The role of echocardiography in blunt chest trauma: Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Trauma 1994;36:53-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Chiu WC, D'amelio LE, Jeffrey S. Hammond. Sternal fractures in blunt chest trauma: A practical algorithm for management. Am J Emerg Med 1997;15:252-5.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Keller KD, Shatney CH. Creatine phosphokinase-MB assays in patients with suspected myocardial contusion: Diagnostic test or test of diagnosis. J Trauma 1988;28:58-63.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Collins JN, Cole FJ, Weireter LJ, Riblet JL, Britt LD. The usefulness of serum troponin levels in evaluating cardiac injury. Am Surg 2001;67:821-6.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Swaanenburg JC, Klaase JM, DeJongste MJ, Zimmerman KW, ten Duis HJ. Troponin I, troponin T, CKMB-activity and CKMB-mass as markers for the detection of myocardial contusion in patients who experienced blunt trauma. Clin Chem Acta 1998;272:171-81.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors, Student Course Manual (ATLS). 8 th ed. USA: American College of Surgeons; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Cubasch H, Degiannis E. The deadly dozen of chest trauma. J Contin Med Educ 2004;22:369-72.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Gouldman JW, Miller RS. Sternal fracture: A benign entity? Am Surg 1997;63:17-9.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Bar I, Friedman T, Rudis E, Shargal Y, Friedman M, Elami A. Isolated sternal fracture - a benign condition? Isr Med Assoc J 2003;5:105-6.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Gibson LD, Carter R, Hinshaw DB. Surgical significance of sternal fracture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962;114:443-8.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Hendrickson SC, Koger KE, Morea CJ, Aponte RL, Smith PK, Levin LS. Sternal plating for the treatment of sternal nonunion. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:512-8.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Sommer C. Fixation of transverse fractures of the sternum and sacrum with the locking compression plate system: Two case reports. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:487-90.  Back to cited text no. 40
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Al-achraf Khoriati
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage SG1 4AB, Hertfordshire
England
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.110763

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Surgical management of traumatic isolated sternal fracture and manubriosternal dislocation
Duilio Divisi,Gabriella Di Leonardo,Roberto Crisci
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013; 75(5): 824
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Prognosis and Co...
   Investigations
   Management
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2871    
    Printed122    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded20    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal