Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:1526   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 330-332

Comparing the results penetrating colon injuries based on intervention by surgeons with different levels of experience in West Indies


1 Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad, West Indies
2 Department of Surgery, General Hospital, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad, West Indies

Correspondence Address:
Michael J Ramdass
Department of Surgery, General Hospital, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad
West Indies
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.83832

Rights and Permissions

Background : Numerous studies have established the safety of primary repair for civilian penetrating colonic injuries with little data exploring the experience of surgeon performing the procedure. Owing to financial, staff and administrative constraints in the developing world, surgeons-in-training sometimes find themselves faced with having to perform major surgery for penetrating colonic injuries with no experienced surgeon in attendance, but available for advice via phone. With this thought, we collected retrospective data to analyse our outcomes based on this practice. Materials and Methods : Over a 10-year period 62 patients with penetrating colonic trauma underwent laparotomies with analysis done on 53 cases. Severity of injury, grade of operating surgical staff and outcome were noted. Outcomes of "inexperienced surgeons" and "experienced surgeons" were compared to determine if a difference exists in outcome based on experience or grade of surgeon. Results : A total of 53 patients with penetrating colon injures underwent primary repair and/or anastomosis with 18 (34%) performed by "inexperienced surgeons" and 35 (66%) by "experienced surgeons". There was one death unrelated to colon trauma with an "inexperienced surgeon" and one anastomotic leak in a patient operated on by an "experienced surgeon". Conclusion : This data supports previous reports on the safety of primary repair for penetrating colonic injuries and raises the point that in cases of lower severity of injury inexperienced surgeons have similar results to experienced surgeons with regard to primary repair.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1810    
    Printed172    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal