Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:233   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 23-28
Impact of general versus epidural anesthesia on early post-operative cognitive dysfunction following hip and knee surgery


1 Department of Anesthesiology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
2 Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Anesthesiology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
3 Department of Anesthesiology, Burdwan Medical College, West Bengal, India
4 Department of Community Medicine, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences and Central Referral Hospital, 5th Mile, Tadong, Gangtok, Sikkim-737102, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission30-Nov-2009
Date of Acceptance02-Sep-2010
Date of Web Publication18-Feb-2011
 

   Abstract 

Background : Post-operative cognitive dysfunction is the subtle cerebral complication temporally seen following surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the influence of either general anesthesia (GA) or epidural anesthesia (EA) on the early post-operative neurocognitive outcome in elderly (>59 years) subjects undergoing hip and knee surgery. Methods : A total of 60 patients were recruited in a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study, comparable by age and sex. They were enrolled and randomized to receive either EA (n = 30) or GA (n = 30). All of them were screened using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), with components of the Kolkata Cognitive Screening Battery. The operated patients were re-evaluated 1 week after surgery using the same scale. The data collected were analyzed to assess statistical significance. Results : We observed no statistical difference in cognitive behavior in either group pre-operatively, which were comparable with respect to age, sex and type of surgery. Grossly, a significant difference was seen between the two groups with respect to the perioperative changes in verbal fluency for categories and MMSE scores. However, these differences were not significant after the application of the Bonferroni correction for multiple analyses, except the significant differences observed only in the MMSE scores. Conclusions : We observed a difference in cognitive outcome with GA compared with EA. Certain aspects of the cognition were affected to a greater extent in this group of patients undergoing hip and knee surgery.

Keywords: Anesthesia, cognitive dysfunction, epidural, general

How to cite this article:
Mandal S, Basu M, Kirtania J, Sarbapalli D, Pal R, Kar S, Kundu KK, Sarkar U, Gupta SD. Impact of general versus epidural anesthesia on early post-operative cognitive dysfunction following hip and knee surgery. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2011;4:23-8

How to cite this URL:
Mandal S, Basu M, Kirtania J, Sarbapalli D, Pal R, Kar S, Kundu KK, Sarkar U, Gupta SD. Impact of general versus epidural anesthesia on early post-operative cognitive dysfunction following hip and knee surgery. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Aug 12];4:23-8. Available from: http://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2011/4/1/23/76829



   Introduction Top


Cerebral insults that follow surgery are now clearly defined and categorized into distinct syndromes of post-operative delirium, cognitive dysfunction and major neurological complications like stroke. To what extent surgery or the anesthetic drugs are attributable for such consequences is difficult to determine as both are inseparable. [1] Cognitive dysfunction is an impairment of the information-processing abilities of the brain, like attention, perception, verbal abilities, learning and memory and abstract thinking. [2] Post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is one such subtle cerebral complication that is temporally seen following surgery. It is defined as decline of 20% or more in the cognitive screening scores on at least 20% or more of the psychometric tests performed pre-operatively and 1 week (early) and 3 months (delayed) post-operatively. [3] Alternatively, deterioration by some criterion number of standard deviation units can be used for its diagnosis. The aged brain is different from the younger brain in several important aspects, including size, distribution and type of neurotransmitters, metabolic functions and capacity for plasticity. For these reasons, the elderly brain is more vulnerable and susceptible to the adverse neurological sequelae of surgery and anesthesia. [4] Bedford in 1955 first published that anesthesia could have long-lasting amnesic effects. But, the term POCD has appeared only recently, covering a wide range of neuropsychological deviations, ranging from concentration impairment to delirium. [5] POCD is a condition defined as an abnormality on neuropsychological testing, which can afflict up to 14% of the older than 70 years patients undergoing elective surgery with no convincingly demonstrated surgical, anesthetic and environmental risk factors. [6],[7],[8]

POCD after coronary artery bypass graft surgery was depicted to occur in 53% of the patients at discharge, 36% at 6 weeks and 24% at 6 months. [9] The description of POCD remained contentious and many diverse definitions were put forth in surgical literatures. [10],[11] According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, POCD is considered a mild neurocognitive disorder if the patient scores 12 or more points on the Delirium Rating Scale. [12]

Risk factors of POCD can be divided into age and co-morbidity dependent and those related to anesthesia and surgery. Cardiovascular, orthopedic and urologic interventions carry a higher risk of POCD. Orthopedic surgeries, particularly those on the hip and knee, are associated with a high incidence of acute POCD as studied by Koch et al. [13] Age is a well-established risk factor for the development of both early and delayed POCD, as demonstrated in ISPOCD1. [14],[15]

Increasing age and duration of anesthesia, little education, a second operation, post-operative infection and respiratory complications are the risk factors for early POCD at 1 week but only age was a risk factor for late POCD at 3 months. [18] Acute post-operative pain has also been associated with poorer post-operative cognitive function. The degree of chronic pre-operative pain is however not related to pre-operative cognitive test performance. [17] History of alcohol abuse in elderly patients has been found to be a risk for post-operative cognitive decline in the domains of visuospatial abilities and executive functions. [18]

To what extent anesthesia itself is a causal factor for such deterioration of cognitive performance might be determined by a comparison of the post-operative decline of scores between groups receiving general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia, respectively. In this context, an effort has been made in the present study to compare the cognitive changes in elderly patients undergoing hip and knee surgery following GA and epidural anesthesia (EA), respectively.


   Methods Top


The study was undertaken in a tertiary care hospital of Kolkata during March 2007 and August 2008. It was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study recruiting 60 adults of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, scheduled for hip and knee orthopedic surgery. For the purpose of sample size calculation, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) component of the Kolkata Cognitive Screening Battery was used. In order to detect a difference of 1.5 in MMSE between the two study groups with 80% power and 5% probability of type 1 error, 29 subjects were required per group. This calculation assumed an SD of 2 in the MMSE score. Thus, 30 patients in each group were recruited. The exclusion criteria included those whose MMSE score at screening was ≤23, patients with diseases of the central nervous system, patients with history of consumption of tranquilizers or antidepressants, patients with severe visual or auditory handicap, patients currently diagnosed with alcoholism or drug dependence, history of previous neuropsychological testing, those having a geriatric depression score ≥21, patients undergoing a second procedure even if unrelated and patients of ASA grade III and IV (i.e., with coexisting severe cardiovascular, respiratory, renal or hepatic diseases).

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. All the patients or their caregivers were explained about the purpose of the study and were ensured strict confidentiality, and a written informed consent was obtained from each of the patients prior to the study. They were given the option of not participating in the study if they did not want to.

All patients were screened using MMSE. Patients with scores fulfilling the inclusion criteria were further tested with the components of the Kolkata Cognitive Screening Battery. Our cognitive screening test battery consisted of category-based verbal fluency tests (fruits and animals), a 15-item version of the object naming test, mental state examination, calculation tests, visuo-constructional ability (which included drawing the circle, diamond, overlapping rectangles and box) and a set of memory tests that consisted of immediate memory, delayed and recognition of a 10-item wordlist. This test battery has already been used and validated by Ganguli and her colleagues in a rural Ballabgarh population in north India and was named the Kolkata Cognitive Screening Battery. [19],[20],[21] Patients were subsequently randomized into two groups, groups A and B, to receive GA and EA, respectively, representing an equal number in both groups and an equal distribution of sexes. All the patients were pre-medicated with oral diazepam 5 mg 2 h prior to surgery. Patients were monitored with electrocardiography, pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure measurement.

Patients of group A were pre-oxygenated for 3 min and administered fentanyl (2 μg/kg). Induction was achieved with thiopentone sodium (4-6 mg/kg) intravenously till loss of eye lash reflex was observed. Muscle relaxation was acquired with vecuronium bromide (100 μg/kg) and the participants were ventilated with face mask till cuffed endotracheal tube of appropriate size was inserted under direct laryngoscopic visualization. After intubation, its position was confirmed using capnography and chest auscultation and then mechanically ventilated. Patients were subsequently maintained on nitrous oxide (66%) in oxygen and halothane (0.5 MAC), with top-up doses of fentanyl and vecuronium as required. After completion of surgery, the anesthetics were discontinued and the patients were extubated following reversal of neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine (50 μg/kg) and glycopyrrolate (10 μg/kg). Post-operative analgesia was maintained with tramadol (2 mg/kg) intramuscularly on request along with diclofenac sodium (75 mg) intramuscularly twice-daily. In group B patients, under strict aseptic precaution and on infiltration with local anesthetic, a epidural 18G multiorifice catheter was placed 2 cm inside the lumbar epidural space through a 16G Tuohy epidural needle. The epidural space was identified by the loss of resistance technique using saline. A test dose of 3 ml of 2% lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline was administered through the epidural catheter port on negative aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid and blood. This was to rule out accidental intrathecal or intravascular placement. On confirmation of proper positioning within the epidural space, intraoperative anesthesia was induced with 16-18 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Subsequent top-up doses were given according to requirement and duration of surgery. In the post-operative period, analgesia was maintained with intermittent epidural boluses of 50 mg tramadol in 10 ml normal saline at 6-hourly intervals. Catheters were removed after 48 h following surgery. Surgeries were undertaken as a routine procedure and the operated patients were re-evaluated after 1 week using the Kolkata Cognitive Screening Battery as done pre-operatively.

The study findings were disseminated to the patients and their caregivers in health education sessions to complement the findings of the study.

Statistical analysis

The collected data were thoroughly cleaned and entered into MS-Excel spread sheets and analysis was carried out. The procedures involved were transcription, preliminary data inspection, content analysis and interpretation. The statistical analyses were carried out using Graph Pad In Stat "version 3" software. Cognitive screening scores were compared between the two groups using Student's unpaired t-test, with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.


   Results Top


The two groups were comparable regarding age and sex. The mean age of the patients undergoing surgery under GA was 67.13 years (SD 7.10) while those operated under lumbar EA had a mean age of 66.63 years (SD 5.61). The two groups were also comparable with regard to the type of surgery being undertaken. A majority (30.00%) of the patients underwent bipolar prosthesis, followed by Austin Moore prosthesis (25.00%) and dynamic hip screw (21.6%) placement. [Table 1].
Table 1: Distribution of groups on the basis of type of surgery

Click here to view


The mean and SD of both groups were also comparable in terms of various cognitive parameters, as assessed pre-operatively. Group A had a mean of 28.96 in terms of verbal fluency, 14.86 in object naming test, 27.30 in MMSE, 12.03 in visual-constructional ability, 4.73 in calculation ability, 19.93 in immediate memory recall and 19.56 in delayed memory recall. Similarly, in group B, the means were 30.80, 14.90, 28.03, 12.36, 4.76, 20.93 and 19.53 in terms of verbal fluency, object naming test, MMSE, visual-constructional ability, calculation ability, immediate memory recall and delayed memory recall, respectively. The aggregate score in group A was 135.33 and in group B was 140.26. There was no significant statistical association between the two groups. Post-operatively, group A had a mean of 24.40 in terms of verbal fluency, 14.86 in object naming test, 25.16 in MMSE, 11.36 in visual-constructional ability, 4.33 in calculation ability, 21.96 in immediate memory recall and 19.43 in delayed memory recall. Similarly, in group B, the means were 27.86, 14.90, 26.83, 11.50, 4.30, 23.40 and 19.46 in terms of verbal fluency, object naming test, MMSE, visual-constructional ability, calculation ability, immediate memory recall and delayed memory recall, respectively. The aggregated score in group A was 125.00 and that in group B was 132.00. There was a significant statistical association between the two groups in regard to post-operative verbal fluency, MMSE, immediate and delayed memory recall and aggregate score. However, these differences were not significant after the application of the Bonferroni correction for multiple analyses, except the significant differences observed only in the MMSE scores. The two groups were not comparable in terms of object naming test, visual-constructional ability and calculation ability [Table 2].
Table 2: Post-operative cognitive function scores in response to general and epidural anesthesia

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


We observed no statistical difference in cognitive behavior in either group pre-operatively who were comparable with respect to age, sex and type of surgery. A significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to only the MMSE scores of the Kolkata Cognitive Screening Battery.

In the study conducted by Rasmussen et al., regional anesthesia (20/158; 12.7%) was associated with a significantly low incidence of POCD compared with GA (33/156; 21.2%) 1 week after surgery. However, the incidences declined at 3 months following surgery (13.9% vs. 14.3%) and were found to be statistically non-significant. [14] William-Russo et al., in a prospective, randomized study comparing two groups receiving EA and GA undergoing unilateral total knee replacement, got no significant differences post-operatively at 1 week and 6 months. Overall, 5% of the patients exhibited cognitive decline at 6 months post-operatively, but with no statistically significant difference between the two anesthesia groups. [22] A study by Bryson et al.[23] and Jones et al. [24] on elderly patients similarly did not demonstrate any difference in outcome regarding cognitive and functional competence between the two groups receiving regional or GA. Papaioannou et al. demonstrated significant differences between the general and the regional techniques with respect to cognitive outcome in elderly following 3 days of surgery. [25] Tzabar et al. in a similar study found a significant deterioration in ambulatory patients with GA in comparison to local anesthesia with respect to cognitive performance. [26]

The Alexandria University study compared the effect of GA or regional vertebral analgesia (subarachnoid or epidural) on post-operative cognitive function in patients undergoing orthopedic and urologic surgery. Using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale revised pre-operatively and post-operatively, cognitive functions did not change significantly in young adult patients after either general or regional vertebral nor in elderly patients who received regional vertebral as compared with the pre-operative levels. Regional vertebral analgesia was observed to be advantageous over GA for elderly patients in terms of a better post-operative neuropsychological functioning. [27]

In the Peking University First Hospital study, cognitive function was assessed pre-operatively and 7 days post-operatively using a battery of nine neuropsychological tests in elderly patients. Early POCD occurred in 46.7% of the elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery. However, there was no significant difference between the effects of the two different methods of anesthesia and post-operative analgesia on the incidence of POCD. [28] A study from France to evaluate the effects of anesthesia on the incidence of cognitive dysfunction after orthopedic surgery in elderly patients in a French post-operative cognitive decline persisted for up to 3 months in 56% of the subjects. Dysfunction was limited to verbal, visuo-spatial and semantic abilities and secondary and implicit memory. [29]

Machado et al. evaluated the cognitive function of patients (ASA grade I and II) submitted to orthopedic, urologic, gynecologic, general and ENT surgery using the mini mental state test, which was performed 24 h before and 24 h after anesthesia. There was a high correlation between pre- and post-operative MMS scores (R = 0.94), which was comparable with our study. Patients in the general balanced anesthesia group showed a significant (P < 0.001) decrease in cognitive performance 24 h after surgery in comparison with the pre-operative test. No differences were observed between the pre- and post-operative MMS tests in the total intravenous anesthesia and regional anesthesia groups. [30]

Strength of the study

Early POCD was seen following GA or EA in elderly subjects undergoing hip and knee surgery, and their comparative effects will be considered as modus operandi of anesthesia to evolve a system for holistic care in its positive influence on the process of recovery.

Limitations of the study

It could have been better if we could have followed the post-operative cases at 3 and 6 months respectively to delineate the prognosis of the dysfunctions because early POCD is largely reversible when followed over a period. Also, as there are many risk factors for POCD and all of them were not taken care of, the results may be confounding. It would have been better if we could have extended our study to incorporate social factors related to the research. Despite this limitation, results are believed to be significant, considering that significant number of patients undergoing only orthopedic interventions were recruited in comparison to studies reported in previous literatures.

Future directions of the study

The target organ for anesthetic drugs is the central nervous system. For years together, we had reason to believe that their effects do not outlive their pharmacological actions and that the function of the brain is restored once the drug gets eliminated. There is a need for compilation of increasing evidence in this direction.


   Conclusions Top


Our study showed a significant statistical difference in cognitive functions in patients undergoing hip and knee surgery following GA or EA. Despite several attempts, no gold standard treatment has been devised for POCD. Numerous techniques have been proposed to minimize the risk and reduce perioperative cerebral damage. Such suggestions are rarely evidence based and merely empirically developed strategies. The main objective is to maintain a stable hemodynamic and physiological state, including ventilation, metabolism and blood chemistry. Hypoxia, hypo or hypercapnoea, hypo or hyperglycemia and alteration of sodium amplify the clinical impact of acute vascular cerebral damage and thus their prevention might have a role in reducing the incidence of POCD.

 
   References Top

1.Bilotta F, Tewari A, Rosa G. Perioperative cerebral damage after general Anesthesia. J Anesth Clin Pharmacol 2008;24:124-36.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Silverstein JH, Timberger M, Reich DL, Uysal S. Central nervous system dysfunction after non cardiac surgery and Anesthesia in elderly. Anesthesiology 2007;106:622-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Neubauer R, Golden C. Can POCD be prevented? J Am Physicians and Surgeons 2005;10:22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Johnson T, Monk T, Rasmussen LS, Abildstrom H, Houx P, Korttila K, et al. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in middle-aged patients. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1351-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Ancelin ML, De Roquefeuil G, Ritchie K. Anesthesia and postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: A review of clinical and epidemiological observations. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2000;48:459-72.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Kaleziæ N, Dimitrijeviæ I, Leposaviæ L, Kocica M, Bumbasireviæ V, Vucetiæ C, et al . Postoperative cognitive deficits. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2006;134:331-8.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Saniova B, Drobny M, Sulaj M. Delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction after general anesthesia. Med Sci Monit 2009;15:CS81-7.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Seymour DG, Severn AM. Cognitive dysfunction after surgery and Anesthesia: What can we tell the grandparents? Age Ageing 2009;38:147-50.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2001;344:395-402.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Rasmussen LS, Larsen K, Houx P, Skovgaard LT, Hanning CD, Moller JT, et al. The assessment of postoperative cognitive function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45:275-89.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Newman S, Stygall J, Hirani S, Shaefi S, Maze M. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after noncardiac surgery: A systematic review. Anesthesiology 2007;106:572-90.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4 th ed, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Koch S, Forteza A, Lavernia C, Romano JG, Campo-Bustillo I, Camppo N, et al. Cerebral fat micro embolism and cognitive decline after hip and knee - replacement. Stroke 2007;38:1079-81.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Rasmussen LS, Johnson T, Kuipers HM, Kristensen D, Siersma VD, Vila P, et al. Does general anesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomized study of regional versus general anesthesia in 438 elderly patients. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 2003;47:260-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Moller JT, CluitmansP, Rasmussen LS, Houx P, Rasmussen H, Canet J, et al. Long term post operative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1. Lancet 1998;351:857-61.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Tune LE. Serum anticholinergic activity levels and delirium in elderly. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry 2000;5:149-53.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Heyer EJ, Sharma R, Winfree CJ, Mocco J, McMahon DJ, McCormick PA, et al. Severe pain confounds neuropsychological test performance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2000;22:633-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Hudetz JA, Iqbal Z, Gandhi S, Patterson KM, Hyde TF, Reddy D, et al. Post operative cognitive dysfunction in older patients with history of alcohol abuse. Anesth 2007;106:423-30.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Ganguli M, Dube S, Johnson JM, Pandav R, Chandra V, Dodge HH. Depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment and functional impairment in a rural elderly population in India: A Hindi version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-H). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999;14:807-20.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Ganguli M, Chandra V, Gilby JE, Ratcliff G, Sharma SD, Pandav R, et al. Cognitive test performance in a community - based nondemented elderly sample in rural India: The Indo-U.S. Cross- National Dementia Epidemiology Study. Int Psychogeriatr 1996;8:507-22.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Das SK, Banerjee TK, Mukherjee CS, Bose P, Biswas A, Hazra A, et al. An urban community-based study of cognitive function among non-demented elderly population in India. Neurology Asia 2006;11:37-48.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Williams-Russo P, Sharrock NE, Mattis S, Szatrowski TP, Charlson ME. Cognitive effects after epidural versus general Anesthesia in older adults: A randomized trial. JAMA 1995;274:44-50.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Bryson GL, Wyand A. Evidence-based clinical update: General Anesthesia and the risk of delirium and post operative cognitive dysfunction. Can J Anesth 2006;53:667-77.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Jones MJ, Piggott SE, Vaughan RS, Bayer AJ, Newcombe RG, Twining TC, et al. Cognitive and functional competence after Anesthesia in patients aged over 60: Controlled trial of general and regional Anesthesia for elective hip or knee surgery. Br J Anesth 1990;30:1683-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Papaionnou A, Fraidakis O, Michaloudis D, Balalis C, Askitpoulou H. The impact of the type of anesthesia on cognitive status and delirium during the first postoperative days in elderly patients. Eur J Anesth 2005;22:492-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Tzabar Y, Asbury AJ, Millar K. Cognitive failure after general anesthesia for day-care surgery. Br J Anesth 1996;76:194-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Anwer HM, Swelem SE, el-Sheshai A, Moustafa AA. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in adult and elderly patients-general anesthesia vs subarachnoid or epidural analgesia. Middle East J Anesth 2006;18:1123-38.   Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Pan LF, Wang DX, Li J. Effects of different methods of anesthesia and analgesia on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction after non-cardiac surgery in the elderly. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2006;38:510-4.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Ancelin ML, De Roquefeuil G, Ledésert B, Bonnel F, Cheminal JC, Ritchie K. Exposure to anaesthetic agents, cognitive functioning and depressive symptomatology in the elderly. Br J Psychiatry 2001;178:360-6.   Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Machado H, Pereira MJ, Orfão J, Mendonça D, Ribeiro JL. Changes in cognitive function performance in patients after anesthesia. Acta Med Port 2000;13:85-92.  Back to cited text no. 30
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Ranabir Pal
Department of Community Medicine, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences and Central Referral Hospital, 5th Mile, Tadong, Gangtok, Sikkim-737102
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.76829

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Considerations for the use of short-acting opioids in general anesthesia
Jeff E. Mandel
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Postoperative Cognitive Function Following General Versus Regional Anesthesia
Nicholas Davis,Melissa Lee,Albert Y. Lin,Lisa Lynch,Matthew Monteleone,Louise Falzon,Nighat Ispahany,Susan Lei
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2014; 26(4): 369
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Opioid-Free Perioperative Analgesia for Hemicolectomy in a Patient With Opioid-Induced Delirium: A Case Report and Review of the Analgesic Efficacy of the Alpha-2 Agonist Agents
Patil, S.K. and Anitescu, M.
Pain Practice. 2012; 12(8): 656-662
[Pubmed]
4 Opioid-Free Perioperative Analgesia for Hemicolectomy in a Patient With Opioid-Induced Delirium: A Case Report and Review of the Analgesic Efficacy of the Alpha-2 Agonist Agents
Sheetal K. Patil,Magdalena Anitescu
Pain Practice. 2012; 12(8): 656
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4847    
    Printed293    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded33    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal