Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:1108   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   


 
 Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 135-136
Adhesive bowel obstruction? Not always


1 Department of Surgery, Rochdale Infirmary, Whitehall Street, Rochdale, OL12 0NB; Manor Hospital, Moat road, Walsall, WS2 9XS, United Kingdom
2 Department of Surgery, Rochdale Infirmary, Whitehall Street, Rochdale, OL12 0NB, United Kingdom
3 Manor Hospital, Moat road, Walsall, WS2 9XS, United Kingdom

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission15-Feb-2010
Date of Acceptance15-Sep-2010
Date of Web Publication18-Feb-2011
 

   Abstract 

A 58-year-old man presented acutely with features of post-surgical adhesive small bowel obstruction. Following an unsuccessful trial of conservative management, computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen was performed. This revealed a mass in the ileocaecal region, for which he underwent a subsequent right hemicolectomy. Histology revealed diffuse B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the terminal ileum. Confounding obstructive lesion of the intestine in patients with a history of previous laparotomy is extremely uncommon. Early high resolution imaging may predict diagnosis and consolidate clinical management plans.

Keywords: Adhesion, intestinal lymphoma, Non-Hodgkins lymphoma, small bowel obstruction

How to cite this article:
Mittapalli D, Sebastian B J, Leung E, Barnes N, Senapati P. Adhesive bowel obstruction? Not always. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2011;4:135-6

How to cite this URL:
Mittapalli D, Sebastian B J, Leung E, Barnes N, Senapati P. Adhesive bowel obstruction? Not always. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Nov 12];4:135-6. Available from: http://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2011/4/1/135/76826



   Introduction Top


Adhesions after abdominal surgery are so common that often no other diagnosis is considered in patients presenting with symptoms and signs consistent with SBO: dilated small bowel loops on plain abdominal X-ray and abdominal scar(s). Intra-abdominal adhesions are fibrous bands of scar tissue that bind two separate parts of tissue together. These adhesions develop when the body's repair mechanisms respond to tissue disturbance, such as infection, trauma, radiation and surgery. It is reported that 93% of patients develop adhesions after one laparotomy compared to 10% of patients with no previous abdominal surgery. [1] Fortunately, less than 1% develop SBO within one year of laparotomy. Moreover, these patients have equal risk of developing another pathology as the general population.

Other common causes of SBO include tumour of the caecum, lesions within the small bowel and extrinsic compression by intersussception, hernial neck or extraintestinal tumours. We report a case of a 58 year-old Asian man, with a history of laparotomy for perforated appendicitis a few years earlier, who presented acutely with SBO. Eventually, it was found the cause be due to lymphoma of the terminal ileum. We present the case, discuss management and review the literature.


   Case Report Top


A 58-year-old man presented acutely with clinical and radiological (plain abdominal X-rays) features of SBO. There was no significant past medical history. Past surgical history included cholecystectomy and emergency laparotomy for perforated appendicitis, which were performed years ago. On physical examination, he was hemodynamically stable. His abdomen was diffusely distended and tender, with no signs of peritoneal irritation. There were no palpable masses and bowel sounds were high-pitched. No external hernias were identified. All laboratory investigations were within normal limits, including hemoglobin concentration. Given that, adhesions were considered the most likely cause. Following an unsuccessful trial of conservative management including nasogastric aspiration and intravenous fluids for 48 hours; contrasted abdominal CT was performed on day 3. This revealed a mass in the ileocecal region [Figure 1], for which he subsequently underwent right hemicolectomy. Histology revealed diffuse B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the terminal ileum. The patient was referred for chemotherapy. Four years on, he remained disease-free.
Figure 1: CT scan demonstrating a cecal mass

Click here to view


Adhesive SBO accounts for about 1% of all emergency surgical admissions and 3.3% of all emergency laparotomies. [1] It can occur any time following initial surgery. [2] While management of uncomplicated adhesive SBO is largely conservative, the debate remains over the optimal duration for such non-operative management [3] since only 8% of cases require surgical intervention. Confounding obstructive lesion of the intestine in patients with previous laparotomy is extremely uncommon. As adhesive SBO was the most likely diagnosis, our patient's initial management was considered acceptable. Early high-resolution imaging may elucidate etiology and consolidate clinical management plans. [4] In our patient's case, early CT scan would have led to immediate laparotomy without delay. Therefore, if surgical intervention is deferred on clinical grounds, CT scan should be performed as soon as practicable, provided that there are no contraindications.

 
   References Top

1.Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:60-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Natural history of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 2000;87:1240-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Trésallet C, Lebreton N, Royer B, Leyre P, Godiris-Petit G, Menegaux F. Improving the management of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction with CT-scan and water-soluble contrast medium: A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:1869-76.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Moran BJ. Adhesion-related small bowel obstruction. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:39-44.  Back to cited text no. 4
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
E Leung
Manor Hospital, Moat road, Walsall, WS2 9XS
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.76826

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Case Report
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2144    
    Printed145    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded19    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal