Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:1011   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   


 
LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 305
Surgical field fire and skin burns caused by alcohol-based skin preparation


Department of Surgery, NHL municipal medical college, Ahmedabad, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication19-Jul-2010
 

How to cite this article:
Patel R, Chavda K D, Hukkeri S. Surgical field fire and skin burns caused by alcohol-based skin preparation. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010;3:305

How to cite this URL:
Patel R, Chavda K D, Hukkeri S. Surgical field fire and skin burns caused by alcohol-based skin preparation. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Jul 17];3:305. Available from: http://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2010/3/3/305/66530


Sir,

Cases of fire in the operating room are reported in the literature. The factors that may initiate these fires include alcohol-based surgical prep solutions, electrosurgical equipment, flammable drapes, etc. We report one such case of fire in the surgical field, which was caused while the removal of open end of packed bandage in a patient of severe liver trauma. This letter is to highlight an additional risk factor for surgical field fire.

Our patient was a 25 year- old male admitted with severe blunt abdominal trauma 1 hour before. On examination, the patient's pulse rate 124/minute, blood pressure was 70/50 mm Hg and he had severe pallor. Urgent ultrasonography suggested severe liver injury with massive hemoperitoneum. The patient was immediately shifted to the operation theatre. Our common practice for is to use alcohol (70% w/v) based skin preparation and care for complete drying of skin and then cover drapes. Emergency exploratory laparotomy revealed severe liver parenchymal injury in segments V, VI and VII with active bleeding (Grade IV). Liver packing was carried out with five large-sized cotton bandages tied to each other end to end, and packed around lateral, anterior, and superior surfaces of liver, and three more similar bandages packed around the inferior surface and around the gallbladder. Tails of both the bandages were taken out with two separate abdominal incisions. Further treatment and blood component transfusions had prevented coagulopathy and the patient became hemodynamically stable.

After 48 hours of observation, the patient was taken in operation theatre for pack removal under local anesthesia, with preparation to do laparotomy if required. The patient's abdominal skin was painted with ethyl alcohol 70% w/v. We waited for 3 minutes for evaporation of alcohol and wiped the skin for any retaining alcohol. Then 20ml of 1% Lignocaine was infiltrated around the packed upper tail, and skin incision was made on both sides of the tail to expand local visibility. Electrocautery for hemostasis was just started and accidental fire took place around the incision. The electrocautery was switched off and the fire was rapidly extinguished within seconds with saline and packing with wet gauges. The patient suffered first-degree epidermal burns around the area [Figure 1]. The reason for fire was discovered to be from burned tail of packed bandage, which had retained alcohol. Packed bandages were removed under observation and there was no further bleeding from liver. The first-degree burns [Figure 1] healed with Fremycetin tulle dressing. The patient was discharged on ninth post-operative day.

Operating room fires are uncommon. Nearly 70% of these fires are related to use of electro-surgical equipment and, in 72% of cases, an oxygen-enriched atmosphere has been shown to have contributed to the fire. It has also been noticed that there is a significant risk of fire when alcohol-based surgical prep solutions are used for skin preparation. [1] The fire triangle describes three elements necessary for initiation of a fire, i.e. heat, fuel, and an oxidizer. In the case of operating room fires, an electrosurgical diathermy unit most often provides heat to ignite the flammable substance, although lasers and fiberoptic light sources can be potent heat sources. The fuel is provided by alcohol-based prep solution, drapes, sponges, endotracheal tubes. In the presence of a high oxygen environment, all of these substances can burst into flames and burn intensely. [1]

When alcohol-based prep is used and the patient draped before the solution is completely dry, alcohol vapors can be trapped and channeled to the surgical site or solution wick into the surrounding linen, where a heat source can ignite the vapors. [1] Experimental studies have shown that hot wire cautery or diathermy generates enough heat to ignite all alcohol-based antiseptics even if these contain as little as 20% alcohol. The ignition temperatures for these fluids are within the range of 800-900°C. These temperatures are easily reached with the use of typical electrocautery units. [2] Common cause for ignition of fire is use of electrocautery for hemostasis, before the evaporation of alcohol. [3] Till now, patient was burned during cardiac surgery, [3] and on the face, neck, and shoulders by the fire, which started during cranial burr-hole placement under monitored anesthesia care. [4] Severity of burns to patients is usually grade I, but it can be severe requiring plastic surgery. [1],[3],[4]

When alcohol-based skin preparations have to be used, a few recommendations have to be made which includes: a strict wait for 3 minutes for the solution to dry and the skin is wiped with a cotton swab before draping the surgical site; [1] shaving the skin especially in hirsute patients to prevent pooling of solution in the hair; effectively drape the patient with a clear plastic adhesive drape to prevent collection of flammable vapors beneath the drapes; when the patient's trachea is not intubated (mask anesthesia) oxygen delivery should be kept to the minimum required to keep the oxygen saturation of blood within an acceptable range. [4]

The Hunter Health survey confirmed the risk of alcohol-based skin preparations and suggested strategies to reduce the risk of fire, including discontinuation of use of alcohol-based skin antiseptics in operating theatres; using fire retardant surgical drapes; installing over-current protection devices on electrical equipment; minimizing flammable conditions by avoiding nitrous oxide and using the lowest required concentration of inspired oxygen; using non-flammable cuffed endotracheal tubes; and education and training of operating theatre personnel in fire hazards. [5]


   Acknowledgment Top


0Dr. Pankaj Patel, Dean, NHL Municipal Medical College and Dr. N. C. Vasava, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, are acknowledged for their help and support.

 
   References Top

1.Batra S, Gupta R. Alcohol based surgical prep solution and the risk of fire in the operating room: a case report. Patient Saf Surg 2008;2:10.   Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Briscoe CE, Hill DW, Payne JP. Inflammable antiseptics and theatre fires. Br J Surg 1976;63:981-3.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]    
3.Szentgyorgyi L, Leny A, Tamas E, Peterffy A. Intraoperative fires caused by alcoholic skin antiseptic and diathermy. Magy Seb 2008;61:71-3.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Weber SM, Hargunani CA, Wax MK. Duraprep and the risk of fire during tracheostomy. Head Neck 2006;28:649-52.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Spigelman AD, Swan JR. Skin antiseptics and the risk of operating theatre fires. ANZ J Surg 2005;75:556-8.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Rajan Patel
Department of Surgery, NHL municipal medical college, Ahmedabad
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.66530

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Local adjuvants for benign aggressive bone tumors
Maximilian Martinez,John Hwang,Kathleen S. Beebe
Current Orthopaedic Practice. 2014; 25(6): 573
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Electrocautery burns: Experience with three cases and review of literature
Saaiq, M. and Zaib, S. and Ahmad, S.
Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters. 2012; 25(4): 203-206
[Pubmed]
3 Flammability of topical preparations and surgical dressings in cutaneous and laser surgery: A controlled simulation study
Arefiev, K. and Warycha, M. and Whiting, D. and Alam, M.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2012; 67(4): 700-705
[Pubmed]
4 Fire ignition during laser surgery in pet rodents
Collarile, T. and Di Girolamo, N. and Nardini, G. and Ciraci, I.A. and Selleri, P.
BMC Veterinary Research. 2012; 8(177)
[Pubmed]
5 A patient who was burned in the operative field: A case report [Ameliyat alani{dotless
Chung, S.-H. and Lee, H.-H. and Kim, T.-H. and Kim, J.-S.
Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2012; 18(3): 274-276
[Pubmed]
6 Flammability of topical preparations and surgical dressings in cutaneous and laser surgery: A controlled simulation study
Katharine Arefiev,Melanie Warycha,Dennis Whiting,Murad Alam
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2012; 67(4): 700
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Time-dependent effect of chlorhexidine surgical prep
D.J. Stinner,C.A. Krueger,B.D. Masini,J.C. Wenke
Journal of Hospital Infection. 2011; 79(4): 313
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Time-dependent effect of chlorhexidine surgical prep
Stinner, D.J. and Krueger, C.A. and Masini, B.D. and Wenke, J.C.
Journal of Hospital Infection. 2011; 79(4): 313-316
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2728    
    Printed118    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded38    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 8    

Recommend this journal