Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:98   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   


 
SYMPOSIUM ON CRITICAL CARDIAC CARE IN CHILDREN Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 273-276
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in children


Helsinki Area Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Medi-Heli 01, Vantaa, Finland, Critical Care Medicine Research Group, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission28-Sep-2009
Date of Acceptance24-Apr-2010
Date of Web Publication19-Jul-2010
 

   Abstract 

Prehospital pediatric cardiac arrest is a rare event compared with adult cardiac arrest. Despite the recent advancements in postresuscitation care improving the outcome of adult patients, similar evidence is lacking in pediatric victims of cardiac arrest. In this brief article, the current data on pediatric cardiac arrest occurring in the prehospital setting are reviewed. The annual incidence of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is approximately 8-10 cases per 100,000 persons. The outcome is generally poor, as only 2-9.6% of patients survive to hospital discharge. The neurologic outcome of survivors is good in 24-31% of patients. Current evidence is insufficient to strongly support or refute the use of mild therapeutic hypothermia during the postresuscitation phase in pediatric patients. The application of a goal-directed treatment protocol for pediatric cardiac arrest and postresuscitation syndrome needs to be evaluated.

Keywords: Cardiac arrest, children, CPR, pediatric, prehospital, resuscitation, out-of-hospital

How to cite this article:
Kamarainen A. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in children. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010;3:273-6

How to cite this URL:
Kamarainen A. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in children. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Dec 7];3:273-6. Available from: http://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2010/3/3/273/66531



   Introduction Top


There are few other emergencies that cause as much discomfort to the prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) personnel than pediatric cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Indeed, not only are these events rare and resuscitation of the pediatric patient regarded as stressful, but also the outcome of this condition is often dismal. [1],[2],[3] Recent advances in resuscitation science, such as the application of mild therapeutic hypothermia in the postresuscitation phase has improved the outcome of adult cardiac arrest victims. [4],[5] Similar evidence, however, is lacking in the pediatric population.

The purpose of this review was to briefly summarize the contemporary aspects of prehospital pediatric cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Epidemiologic aspects, such as the incidence, etiology, and outcome are evaluated, as well as the unique features of pediatric cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Articles were searched using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases with the following search terms: "Heart arrest," "Cardiac arrest," "Resuscitation," or "CPR," and "Pediatric," "Paediatric," or "Children," and "Out-of-hospital," "Out of hospital," or "Prehospital." Articles were considered relevant when the incidence and outcome rates were clearly reported and etiologies and neurologic outcome at hospital discharge assessed.

Epidemiological aspects

During the past 20 years, the annual incidence of pediatric prehospital cardiac arrest has constantly remained at 8.0-9.8 cases per 100,000 persons. [3],[6],[7] The arrest occurs most commonly (88%) in a nonpublic location, such as the residence. [3] The mean age of the patients ranges between 2.9 and 6.2, and male patients represent a slight majority (53-62%). [3],[6],[7] The most common etiologies of arrest have been reported to be sudden infant death syndrome, trauma, and respiratory. [2],[6] Still, it is not uncommon that there is no obvious cause for the arrest identifiable in the initial resuscitation phase. [2] Thus it may well be impossible to determine the cause of arrest in at least 14.5% of the cases [8] until autopsy is performed. [7] Also, there is evidence indicating that prehospital clinical diagnosis on the cause of pediatric cardiac arrest has low agreement when compared with coroner's postmortem diagnosis. [8] The most frequently unanticipated diagnoses have been reported to be pneumonia and seizure-related cardiac arrest. [8]

The majority (66-77%) of arrests are not witnessed [2],[3],[6],[7],[9] and the bystanders initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in only 23-35% of cases. [2],[3],[6],[7] Bystander use of an automated external defibrillator is practically nonexistent. [3] The most common initial cardiac rhythm is nonshockable (82%), [3] more specifically asystole in 77.2-79% and pulseless electrical activity in 13.5-16.4% of arrests. [6],[7] As in the adult population, asystole as the initial cardiac rhythm predicts worse survival than other initial rhythms, especially those of shockable nature. [2]

The overall survival to hospital discharge after pediatric prehospital cardiac arrest is low with the reported percentages of 2.0-9.6%. [2],[3],[6],[7],[10] Survival to hospital discharge is more common among children and adolescents than in infants. [3] One study has calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) in different age groups. In that study, the NNT for survival to hospital discharge was 13 for both pediatric and adult victims of cardiac arrest, whereas more specifically NNT was 29 for infants (<1 year), 10 for children (age, 1-11 years), and 8 for adolescents (age, 12-19 years). [3] The neurologic outcome at hospital discharge according to the pediatric cerebral performance category (PCPC) [11] is good (PCPC, 1-2) in 24-31% of the cases. [2],[12]

Pediatric resuscitation

The current pediatric basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) [Figure 1] guidelines were published in 2005 and the forthcoming guidelines will be published on October 18, 2010. [13] The unique features of pediatric BLS are the application of 5 initial rescue breaths prior to chest compressions reflecting a response toward a probable respiratory etiology of arrest. Also, in comparison to the adult BLS sequence, a lone rescuer should perform CPR for 1 min prior to seeking additional help. [13] Although the American Heart Association recommends compressions-only CPR in adult patients, the pediatric CPR algorithm still includes rescue breaths to be performed. [14] In children, the energy used for defibrillation is weight adjusted rather than fixed, using an energy of 4 J/kg with both monophasic and biphasic defibrillators. [13] Vascular access may be difficult to gain, especially in infants. Thus after 3 failed attempts at intravenous access, an intraosseal needle should be inserted. [13] However, one study has indicated that ALS does not increase survival in comparison to BLS, and also decreased survival was observed in association with increased use of intravenous epinephrine. [10]

After successful resuscitation and restoration of spontaneous circulation, treatment is directed toward stabilization of the postarrest myocardial dysfunction and temperature control. [13] The evidence regarding the optimal treatment of the postresuscitation syndrome and temperature control in pediatric patients is scarce. A recent report could not clearly support nor refute the use of mild therapeutic hypothermia treatment in pediatric patients, [15] and implementation of the treatment has remained low. [16] The current evidence on therapeutic hypothermia in pediatric patients is reviewed elsewhere in this symposium of the journal.


   Discussion Top


It is imperative to recognize the recently published aspect that pediatric patients suffering a cardiac arrest in the prehospital setting differ greatly from those patients requiring resuscitation in the hospital. [12] For instance, asystole as the initial cardiac rhythm is more common in prehospital cardiac arrest. Mortality is higher in prehospital cardiac arrest, with 70% of this attributed to neurologic causes in contrast to only 20% in-hospital. [12] These differences have to be taken into account when assessing pediatric cardiac arrest studies and planning future clinical trials.

As the outcome from pediatric cardiac arrest is poor, it would be preferable to recognize and prevent conditions, such as asphyxiation, that lead to cardiac arrest. [13] However, in the prehospital setting, the onset of arrest is often unwitnessed, [2],[7],[9] thus making prevention unlikely. As a secondary measure, the rate of bystander CPR needs to be increased. The simplification of the pediatric BLS algorithm has strived to lower the threshold to initiate CPR. [13] However, bystander CPR is provided at best in only one third of the cases. The current guidelines encourage that the adult BLS sequence also may be used in pediatric cardiac arrest victims rather than do nothing due to the unfounded fear of doing harm. [13]

Based on the studies on adult patients, high-quality continuous CPR needs to be provided by EMS personnel to improve the outcome. [17],[18],[19] After successful resuscitation, care must be taken to avoid hyperthermia, as this is detrimental in the postresuscitation phase. [13] Whether the beneficial effects of mild hypothermia observed in adult cardiac arrest victims [4],[5] and also after neonatal asphyxia [20] apply to pediatric cardiac arrest victims is yet to be shown. Additionally, a standardized treatment protocol including interventions, such as early percutaneous coronary intervention, therapeutic hypothermia, and control of hemodynamic and metabolic factors has been shown to improve the outcome of adult victims of prehospital cardiac arrest. [21] It is tempting to assume that a similar goal-directed treatment protocol adjusted to pediatric cardiac arrest and postresuscitation syndrome would be beneficial and therefore another likely focus of future research.

Finally, although improved survival might be achieved with the above-discussed interventions, it may be necessary to reconsider attempting resuscitation in certain cases of pediatric cardiac arrest. Although it is considered stressful to withhold or cease resuscitation attempts in children, [1] such an approach might be necessary, especially in cases of unwitnessed arrest with asystole as the initial rhythm as futility has been observed in adult victims in similar conditions [22] and children seem to have no better tendency to recover. [13]


   Conclusion Top


Prehospital pediatric cardiac arrest exerts dismal outcome with regard to the proportion of survivors per EMS-attended resuscitation attempts. This may well reflect the negative initial setting in majority of the cases, that is, unwitnessed arrest and a nonshockable initial rhythm. While the management of pediatric cardiac arrest needs to be further developed and studied regarding, for instance, the application of therapeutic hypothermia, it might also be necessary to discuss the futility and justification of resuscitation in some cases. However, it is important to recognize the differences between prehospital and in-hospital pediatric patients, as well as the distinct characteristics of resuscitating a child compared with an adult victim of cardiac arrest.


   Acknowledgment Top


I thank Dr. Janne Virta for his expert commentary on the manuscript.

 
   References Top

1.Hall WL, Myers JH, Pepe PE, Larkin GL, Sirbaugh PE, Persse DE. The perspective of paramedics about on-scene termination of resuscitation efforts for pediatric patients. Resuscitation 2004;60:175-87.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Young KD, Gausche-Hill M, McClung CD, Lewis RJ. A prospective, population-based study of the epidemiology and outcome of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest. Pediatrics 2004;114:157-64.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Atkins DL, Everson-Stewart S, Sears GK, Daya M, Osmond MH, Warden CR, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children: The resuscitation outcomes consortium epistry-cardiac arrest. Circulation 2009;119:1484-91.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, et al. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002;346:557-63.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.The Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2002;346:549-56.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Gerein RB, Osmond MH, Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Burns S; OPALS Study Group. What are the etiology and epidemiology of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest in Ontario, Canada? Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:653-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.Kuisma M, Suominen P, Korpela R. Paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests - epidemiology and outcome. Resuscitation 1995;30:141-50.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.Ong ME, Osmond MH, Gerein R, Nesbitt L, Tran ML, Stiell I. Comparing pre-hospital clinical diagnosis of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with etiology by coroner's diagnosis. Resuscitation 2007;72:26-34.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Engdahl J, Axelsson Ε, Bεng A, Karlson BW, Herlitz J. The epidemiology of cardiac arrest in children and young adults. Resuscitation 2003;58:131-8.  Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Pitetti R, Glustein JZ, Bhende MS. Prehospital care and outcome of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002;6:283-90.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]    
11.Fiser DH. Assessing the outcome of pediatric intensive care. J Pediatr 1992;121:68-74.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]    
12.Moler FW, Meert K, Donaldson AE, Nadkarni V, Brilli RJ, Dalton HJ, et al. In-hospital versus out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest: A multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2259-67.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
13.ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2005;112:IV1-203.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
14.Sayre MR, Berg RA, Cave DM, Page RL, Potts J, White RD. Hands-only (compression-only) cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A call to action for bystander response to adults who experience out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest: A science advisory for the public from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee. Circulation 2008;117:2162-7.  Back to cited text no. 14      
15.Doherty DR, Parshuram CS, Gaboury I, Hoskote A, Lacroix J, Tucci M, et al. Hypothermia therapy after pediatric cardiac arrest. Circulation 2009;119:1492-500.  Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
16.Haque IU, LaTour MC, Zaritsky AL. Pediatric critical care community survey of knowledge and attitudes toward therapeutic hypothermia in comatose children after cardiac arrest. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006;7:7-14.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
17.van Hoeyweghen RJ, Bossaert LL, Mullie A, Calle P, Martens P, Buylaert WA, et al. Quality and efficiency of bystander CPR. Resuscitation 1993;26:47-52.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]    
18.Wik L, Andreas Steen P, Bircher NG. Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 1994;28:195-203.  Back to cited text no. 18      
19.Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Sorebo H, Svensson L, Fellows B, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005;293:299-304.  Back to cited text no. 19      
20.Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, Ballard R, Edwards AD, Ferriero DM, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: Multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2005;365:663-70.  Back to cited text no. 20  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
21.Sunde K, Pytte M, Jacobsen D, Mangschau A, Jensen LP, Smedsrud C, et al. Implementation of a standardised treatment protocol for post resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2007;73:29-39.  Back to cited text no. 21  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
22.Vayrynen T, Kuisma M, Maatta T, Boyd J. Medical futility in asystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:81-7.  Back to cited text no. 22      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Antti Kamarainen
Helsinki Area Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Medi-Heli 01, Vantaa, Finland, Critical Care Medicine Research Group, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere
Finland
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.66531

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Scholastic Age Category*
Manabu Akahane,Seizan Tanabe,Toshio Ogawa,Soichi Koike,Hiromasa Horiguchi,Hideo Yasunaga,Tomoaki Imamura
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 14(2): 130
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Characteristics and outcomes of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by scholastic age category
Akahane, M. and Tanabe, S. and Ogawa, T. and Koike, S. and Horiguchi, H. and Yasunaga, H. and Imamura, T.
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 14(2): 130-136
[Pubmed]
3 Impact of telephone dispatcher assistance on the outcomes of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Akahane, M. and Ogawa, T. and Tanabe, S. and Koike, S. and Horiguchi, H. and Yasunaga, H. and Imamura, T.
Critical Care Medicine. 2012; 40(5): 1410-1416
[Pubmed]
4 Impact of telephone dispatcher assistance on the outcomes of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest*
Manabu Akahane,Toshio Ogawa,Seizan Tanabe,Soichi Koike,Hiromasa Horiguchi,Hideo Yasunaga,Tomoaki Imamura
Critical Care Medicine. 2012; 40(5): 1410
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Problems with placement and using of automated external defibrillators in Czech Republic [Problematika rozmístění a použití automatizovaných externích defibrilátorů v České republice]
Olos, T. and Burša, F. and Gřegoř, R. and Holeš, D.
Casopis Lekaru Ceskych. 2011; 150(9): 494-498
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3088    
    Printed143    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded49    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal