Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Home About us Editors Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives Search Instructions Subscribe Advertise Login 
Users online:1982   Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size   


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 89-94
Characteristics of associated craniofacial trauma in patients with head injuries: An experience with 100 cases


Department of Neurosurgery, K.S.Hegde Medical Academy, Deralakatte-575018, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

   Abstract 

Background: Facial fractures and concomitant cranial injuries carry the significant potential for mortality and neurological morbidity mainly in young adults. Aims and Objectives: To analyze the characteristics of head injuries and associated facial injuries, the management options and outcome following cranio-facial trauma. Methods: This retrospective review was performed at Justice K. S. Hegde Charitable Hospital, and associated A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore. Following Ethical Committee approval, hospital charts and radiographs of 100 consecutive patients of cranio-facial trauma managed at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Neurosurgery between January 2004 and December 2004 were reviewed. Results: Majority of the patients were in the 2nd to 4th decade (79%) with a male to female ratio of -8.09:1. Road traffic accidents were the common cause of craniofacial trauma in present study (54%) followed by fall from height (30%). Loss of consciousness was the most common clinical symptom (62%) followed by headache (33%). Zygoma was the most commonly fractured facial bone 48.2% (alone 21.2%, in combination 27.2%). Majority of patients had mild head injury and managed conservatively in present series. Causes of surgical intervention for intracranial lesions were compound depressed fracture, contusion and intracranial hematoma. Operative indications for facial fractures were displaced facial bone fractures. Major causes of mortality were associated systemic injuries. Conclusion: Adult males are the most common victims in craniofacial trauma, and road traffic accidents were responsible for the majority. Most of the patients sustained mild head injuries and were managed conservatively. Open reduction and internal fixation with miniplates was used for displaced facial bone fractures.

Keywords: Craniofacial trauma, facial fracture, head injury

How to cite this article:
Rajendra PB, Mathew TP, Agrawal A, Sabharawal G. Characteristics of associated craniofacial trauma in patients with head injuries: An experience with 100 cases. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2009;2:89-94

How to cite this URL:
Rajendra PB, Mathew TP, Agrawal A, Sabharawal G. Characteristics of associated craniofacial trauma in patients with head injuries: An experience with 100 cases. J Emerg Trauma Shock [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Nov 20];2:89-94. Available from: http://www.onlinejets.org/text.asp?2009/2/2/89/50742



   Introduction Top


Actually transmit forces directly to neurocranium, resulting in more serious brain injuries. [1],[2],[3],[4] In view of high incidence of closed head injury in facial fracture population, as well as the potential for mortality and neurological morbidity, the practicing oral maxillofacial surgeon should be cognizant of this condition including its management. [5] A clearer understanding of the patterns of facial injuries will also assist health care providers to plan and manage the treatment of traumatic facial injuries. Such epidemiological information can also be used to guide the future funding of public health programs geared toward prevention. In this study, we analyze epidemiology, clinical characteristics and management options in patients with cranio-facial trauma.

Aims and objectives

The aim of present study were to analyze the characteristics of head injuries and associated facial injuries, to study the patterns of facial injuries in patients with head injury and to study the management options and outcome following cranio-facial trauma.


   Materials and Methods Top


This retrospective review was performed at Justice K. S. Hegde Charitable Hospital, and associated A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore. Following Ethical Committee approval, hospital charts and radiographs of 100 consecutive patients managed for cranio-facial trauma at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Neurosurgery between January 2004 and December 2004 were reviewed. All clinical records, investigations and treatment charts were reviewed and data regarding age, gender, etiology and pattern of injuries, anatomic site and pattern of facial fractures, associated cranial injuries and treatment details and complications were analyzed. The craniofacial fractures were identified according to anatomic location, age, and sex of the patient, cause of injury, additional injuries and systemic injuries. The Ommaya classification of head injury was used, and patients with head injuries were categorized into three grades: mild, moderate, or severe categories (based on the period of loss of consciousness and amnesia). [6] Maxillofacial trauma included trauma of the craniofacial skeleton (extending from the frontal bone to the mandible). The types of cranial fracture were classified by anatomic location as frontal, sphenoid, temporal, parietal and occipital. Fractures of the facial skeleton [7] based on facial bone imaging were grouped as lower face (LF - mandible), mid face (MF - maxilla, nose, zygoma, and orbits) and upper face (UF - frontal). Systemic injuries were grouped into following categories as lacerations and abrasions, injuries to liver, kidney, bladder and bowels, hemothorax, pneumothorax, loss of vision, fractures, long bone fractures, fracture, and spinal cord injury. Patients with signs and symptoms of possible intracranial injury and/or facial bone fractures underwent computed tomography (CT). The final diagnosis of facial fracture was made by the attending radiologist. Brain trauma was handled by Neurosurgery Department, and complex facial fractures were repaired by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department.


   Results Top


There were total 100 patients in present study who sustained cranial and/or maxillofacial injuries and majority of the patients were in 2nd to 4th decade (79%). Patients below 10 years (8%) and after 50 years (15%) were less commonly affected [Figure 1]. Eighty percent of patients in our study were male, and incidence of craniofacial injuries in female was 11 percent (male to female ratio - 8.09:1). Road traffic accidents were the commonest cause of craniofacial trauma in present study (54%) followed by fall from height (30%), assault (9%), occupational injuries (5%) and sports related injuries (1%) were less common causes of craniofacial trauma. One patient sustained injury in train accident. Loss of consciousness was the most common clinical symptom (62%) followed by headache (33%). Other clinical features were vomiting (27%), nasal bleed (30%) and oral bleed (10%). 33% patients had associated facial injuries, and the zygoma was the most commonly fractured facial bone (48.2%; alone 21.2%, in combination 27.2%). This was followed by mandible fracture (42%; alone 36%, in combination 6%). Maxilla was involved in 39.4% (alone 15.2%, in combination 24.2%). Loss of consciousness was commoner in patients with intracranial injury, and it was mainly due to concussion head injury (56%). In patients with facial fractures, association of loss of consciousness was most common with mandible fracture (14.7%) followed by zygomatic (8.2%) and maxillary (4.9%) fractures. Majority of the patients (93%) sustained mild head injury, two and five patients sustained moderate and severe head injury, respectively. All patients who sustained moderate (GCS 10-12, two cases) or severe head injury (GCS 6-9, five cases) had associated intracranial injury. All patient with facial bone fractures in present series sustained mild head injury (GCS 12-15). There was history of alcohol intake in 10 patients. Five patients sustained abdominal injuries (hemoperitoneum - 2, renal injury - 1, splenic injury - 1 and intestinal injury in 1 patient). Two patient sustained spinal injuries (fracture of D12 vertebrae and fracture of L1 vertebrae, respectively). Five patients sustained orbital injuries (orbital wall fracture in three cases). Other injuries were long bone fracture (5 cases), rib fracture (3 cases) and hemothorax (2 cases) [Figure 2]. Majority of patients had mild head injury and were treated conservatively in the present series. Causes of surgical intervention for intracranial lesions were compound depressed fracture of frontal bone (two cases - wound debridement and internal fixation) [Figure 3a],[Figure 3b] and [Figure 4a],[Figure 4b],[Figure 4c], decompression of left temporal contusion (one case) evacuation of intracranial hematoma (extradural hematoma - 2 cases, chronic subdural hematoma - 4 cases) and suturing of scalp lacerations in 7 cases. Operative indications for facial fractures were displaced mandibular fractures (9 cases), zygomatic fractures (6 cases), maxilla fractures (3 cases) and zygomatic + maxilla fractures (7 cases) [Figure 5a],[Figure 5b],[Figure 5c],[Figure 5d]. In all these patients, open reduction and internal fixation was performed, and fixation was achieved with miniplates. Isolated undisplaced fractures of mandible were treated conservatively with arch bar fixation alone.

Complications and mortality

Two patients developed wound infection and were treated conservatively. Two patients expired in the present series. One patient had associated intra-abdominal injury (splenic rupture), and the other patient sustained pulmonary trauma and succumbed to hemothorax and aspiration.


   Discussion Top


As in present study majority of the vast majority of head and concomitant facial injuries are experienced by young adult males ranging from 3:1 to as high as 11.1:1 in literature. [8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14] This high vulnerability of male gender for all types of trauma can be attributed to the facts that in our society male have more freedom to work outdoor and engage in risk-taking activities, making them more vulnerable to accidents and fall injuries. Road traffic accidents (RTA) are the commonest cause of craniofacial trauma in most of the series, [8],[16],[17],[18] and this occur largely even in our circumstances also because of recklessness and negligence of the driver, poor maintenance of vehicles, often driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and complete disregard of traffic laws. [19] Craniofacial trauma due to falls, altercations, sports, and warfare is less common in the literature. [14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] Fall as one of the common cause of injury in our series can be attributed to the proximity of hospital to a coastal area where lot of peoples work and climb on the coconut trees. Interpersonal violence is becoming a major problem in many areas, and is attributed to the increasing use of alcohol and drugs. [17] In our study, we did not have many cases of such type of injuries; this low number of assault's victims may be explained by underreporting by patients. [8] Though we have not studied the causes of facial trauma in children, the majority of children sustain fall-related injuries mainly at home or playing places. [21],[22] Other causes of facial injuries in children include automobile accidents [23] escalator-related entrapment injuries, particularly in younger children. [24] Recently, severe injuries of the facial skeleton and soft tissues similar to the adults have been described in children's. [25] Alcohol intoxication is a major confounding factor for reduced level of consciousness in patients with head injury, and CT scan is recommended when the level of alcohol intoxication is enough to reduce their GCS. [26] We performed the CT scan in all the cases where the history of alcohol intake was present. Isolated mandibular fractures are most common facial bone fractured (ranging from 12.9% to as high as 72.9%), [8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[27],[28] followed by midface (25.9% to 29.5%), [27],[28] and among motorcyclists, maxilla, orbit, and nasal bones were the most frequently fractured bones. [29] The other frequently affected bones were the floor of the orbit and nasal bones. [30],[31] However, in the present series, zygoma was the most commonly involved facial bone, followed by mandible and maxilla. Apart from maxillofacial fractures, high-velocity impacts may result in ruptures of intracranial vessels, leading to life-threatening intracranial hemorrhages. [32],[33],[34],[35] Loss of consciousness can be manifestation of intracranial injury or concussion head injury; [17],[36],[37],[38] however, loss of consciousness is less common with isolated facial fractures. [37] But at the same time, as in present series, all patients who sustain moderate or severe head injury also have associated intracranial injuries reflecting the severity and complexity of craniofacial trauma. [37] Although the incidence of spinal injuries was low in our series, in all the patients of craniofacial trauma, there should be a high index of suspicion of concomitant cervical spine fracture as up to 10% patients can have associated spinal injuries. [1],[2] Although they represent serious injuries, the workup and treatment of facial fractures is often delayed until more life-threatening problems have been addressed, such as the establishment of an adequate airway, hemodynamic stabilization, and the evaluation and treatment of other more serious injuries of the head, chest and skeleton. [39] Present series signifies that majority of the patients sustain mild head injury and could be managed conservatively. [40],[41] Indications for surgical intervention include compound depressed skull fractures, traumatic intracranial hematomas, contusion and suturing of scalp lacerations. [41] Our management approaches to facial fractures were according to the guidelines described in the literature, including repositioning of the displaced fracture segments into anatomic position, with a focus on the lattice supports in relation to each other and to the cranial base. [42],[43],[44],[45],[46],[47] Undisplaced fractures were managed conservatively, and in displaced fractures, open reduction and internal fixation with miniplates was used. The rigid stabilization of the vertical and horizontal facial fracture helped to support and withstands the forces of mastication, [43],[48],[49],[50],[51],[52] and conservative methods for undisplaced fractures provided acceptable functional and aesthetic results. [20],[28],[52],[53] The incidence of complications in present series was low, and in literature, incidence of post-surgical complications ranges from 5%-5.7%, including infection, asymmetry, and malocclusion. [20],[28],[54] Mortality rate in our series is 2%, and the major cause of this mortality is associated systemic injuries and pulmonary infection. [54]

Limitations

The present study works on the assumption that the given history was an accurate representation of the events. However, because of the retrospective nature of the study, it has inherent limitations that could be due to gaps in information and incomplete records, the accuracy of the original examination and documentation.


   Conclusions Top


The management of fractures to the face remains a challenge for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, demanding both skill and a high level of expertise. In summary, young adult males were the commonest victims of road traffic accidents and usually sustain mild head injuries. Management of the more serious intracranial and life-threatening injuries takes the priority; open reduction and internal fixation with miniplates is recommended for displaced facial bone fractures. A well planned prospective study will provide a clearer understanding of the patterns of facial injuries in patient with head injuries, and this epidemiological as well as clinical information will assist health care providers to plan the management of such injuries and will also guide the future funding of public health programs, particularly to develop prevention strategies.

 
   References Top

1.Haug RH, Wible RT, Likavec MJ, Conforti PJ. Cervical spine fractures and maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:725.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Beirne JC, Butler PE, Brady FA. Cervical spine injuries in patient's facial fractures: A 1- year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:26.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Haug RH, Savage JD, Likavec MJ, Conforti PJ. A review of 100 closed head injuries associated with facial injures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:218-22.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Haug RH, Adams JM, Conforti PJ, Likavec MJ. Cranial fractures associated with facial fractures: A review of mechanism, type and severity of injury. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:729-33.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Conforti PJ, Haug RH, Likavec M. Management of closed head injury in patients with maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:298-303.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Ommaya AK, Rockoff SD, Baldwin N. Experimental concussion. J Neurosurg 1964;21:249-65.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Plaisier BR, Punjabi AP, Super Dm, Haug RH. The relationship between facial fractures and death from neurologic injury. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:708-12.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Zargar M, Khaji A, Karbakhsh M, Zarei MR. Epidemiology study of facial injuries during a 13 month of trauma registry in Tehran. Indian J Med Sci 2004;58:109-14.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal
9.Bataineh AB. Etiology and incidence of maxillofacial fractures in the north of Jordan. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Rehabil Radiol Endod 1998;86:31-5.   Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Ugboko VI, Odusanya SA, Fagade OO. Maxillofacial fractures in a semi-urban Nigerian teaching hospital: A review of 442 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:286-9.   Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Marker P, Nielsen A, Bastian HL. Factures of the mandibular condyle, Part 1: Patterns of distribution of types and causes of fractures in 348 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;38:417-21.   Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Haug RH, Prather J, Indresano AT. An Epidemiologic survey of facial fractures and concomitant injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:926-32.   Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Ellis E 3rd, Moos KF, El-Attar A. Ten years of mandibular fractures: An analysis of 2137 cases. Oral Surg 1985;59:120.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Al Ahmed HE, Jaber MA, Abu Fanas SH, Karas M. The pattern of maxillofacial fractures in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: A review of 230 case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:166-70.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Lynne HY, Kumar M, Charrles MM. Head and neck trauma in hospitalized pediatric patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:255-61.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Down KE, Boot DA, Gorman DF. Maxillofacial and associated injuries in severely traumatized patients: Implications of a regional survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:409-12.   Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Hung YC, Montazem A, Costello MA. The correlation between mandible fractures and loss of Consciousness. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:938-42.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Olson RA, Fonseca RJ, Zeitler DL. Fractures of the mandible: A review of 580 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1982;40:23.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Ajagbe HÁ, Daramola JO, Oluwasanmi JO. Civilian-type facial injuries. A retrospective study of cases seen at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Niger Med J 1977;7:432-6.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Motamedi MH. An assessment of maxillofacial fractures: A 5-year study of 237 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:61-4.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Güzel A, Karasalihoglu S, Küηükugurluoglu Y. Evaluation of the fall-related trauma cases applied to our pediatric emergency department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2007;13:211-6.   Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Bulut M, Koksal O, Korkmaz A, Turan M, Ozguc H. Childhood falls: Characteristics, outcome, and comparison of the injury severity score and new injury severity score. Emerg Med J 2006;23:540-5.   Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Montovani JC, de Campos LM, Gomes MA, de Moraes VR, Ferreira FD, Nogueira EA. Etiology and incidence facial fractures in children and adults. [Article in Portuguese] Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2006;72:235-41.   Back to cited text no. 23    
24.McGeehan J, Shields BJ, Wilkins JR 3rd, Ferketich AK, Smith GA. Escalator-related injuries among children in the United States, 1990-2002. Pediatrics 2006;118:e279-85.   Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Lewandowski B, Szymaρska J. Agriculture-related severe craniofacial injuries in rural children and adolescents. Ann Agric Environ Med 2008;15:59-62.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Dunning J, Daly JP, Malhotra R, Stratford-Smith P, Lomas JP. The implications of NICE guidelines on the management of children presenting with head injury. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:763-7   Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Iida S, Kogo M, Sugiura T, Mima T, Matsuya T. Retrospective analysis of 1502 patients with facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:286-90.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Ansari MH. Maxillofacial fractures in Hamedan province, Iran: A retrospective study (1987-2001). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;32:28-34.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Gopalakrishna G, Peek-Asa C, Kraus JF. Epidemiologic features of facial injuries among motorcyclists. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:425-30.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Hδchl O, Tuli T, Schwabegger A, Gassner R. Maxillofacial trauma due to work-related accidents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:90-3.   Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Hackl W, Fink C, Hausberger K, Ulmer H, Gassner R. The incidence of combined facial and cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 2001;50:41-5.   Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Egol R. Fromm KK, Guntupalli M, Fitzpatrick D, Kaufman, Nasraway S, et al . Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage. Crit Care Med 1999;27:633-8.   Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Keenan HT, Brundage SI, Thompson DC, Maier RV, Rivara FP. Does the face protect the brain? A case-control study of traumatic brain injury and facial fractures. Arch Surg 1999;134:14-7.   Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Derdyn C, Persing JA, Broaddus WC, Delashaw JB, Jane J, Levine PA, et al . Craniofacial trauma: An assessment of risk related to timing of surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:238-45.   Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Yang WG, Chen CT, de Villa GH, Lai JP, Chen YR. Blunt internal carotid artery injury associated with facial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:789-96.   Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Lee KF, Wagner LK, Lee YE, Suh JH, Lee SR. The impact-absorbing effects of facial fractures in closed-head injuries: An analysis of 210 patients. J Neurosurg 1987;66:542-7.   Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Davidoff G, Jakubowski M, Thomas D. The spectrum of closed-head injuries in facial trauma victims: Incidence and impact. Ann Emerg Med 1998;17:6-9.   Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Haug RH, Savage JD, Likavec MJ. A review of 100 closed head injuries associated with facial injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:218-22.  Back to cited text no. 38    
39.Dolan KD, Jacoby CG. Facial fractures. Semin Roentgenol 1978;13:37-51.   Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Alvarez M, Nava JM, Rue M, Quintana S. Mortality prediction in head trauma patients: Performance of Glasgow Coma Score and general severity systems. Crit Care Med 1998;26:142-8.   Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Heard, Li V, Heard A. A useful tool for predicting outcome for the pediatric head trauma patient. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1403-4.   Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Manson PN, Hoopes JE, Su CT. Structural pillars of the facial skeleton: An approach to the management of LeFort fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66:54-61.   Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Gruss JS, Bubak PJ, Egbert MA. Craniofacial fractures: An algorithm to optimize results. Clin Plast Surg 1992;19:195-206.   Back to cited text no. 43    
44.Gruss JS, MacKinnon SE. Complex maxillary fractures: The role of buttress fixation and immediate bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:9-16.   Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Gruss JS, Van Wyck L, Phillips JH. The importance of the zygomatic arch in complex midfacial fracture repair and posttraumatic orbitozygomatic deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85:878-90.   Back to cited text no. 45    
46.Gruss JS. Nasoethmoid orbital fractures: Classification and role of primary bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:303-14.   Back to cited text no. 46    
47.Stanley RB. Reconstruction of the midfacial vertical dimension following LeFort fractures. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:571-5.   Back to cited text no. 47    
48.Stanley RB. Buttress fixation with plates. Operat Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;6:97-103.   Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Zingg M, Leadrach K, Chen J. Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: A review of 1025 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1992;50:778-90.   Back to cited text no. 49    
50.Leipzinger LS, Manson PN. Nasoethmoid orbital fractures: Current concepts and management principles. Clin Plast Surg 1992;19:167-93.   Back to cited text no. 50    
51.Manson PN, Shack RP, Leonard LG. Sagittal fractures of the maxilla and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:484.   Back to cited text no. 51    
52.Marciani RD, Caldwell GT, Levine HJ. Maxillofacial injuries associated with all-terrain vehicles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:119-23.  Back to cited text no. 52    
53.Hidding J, Wolf R, Pingel D. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of fractures of the articular process of the mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992;20:345-53.   Back to cited text no. 53    
54.Erol B, Tanrikulu R, Gorgun B. Maxillofacial fractures. Analysis of demographic distribution and treatment in 2901 patients (25-year experience). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;32:308-13.  Back to cited text no. 54    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Amit Agrawal
Department of Neurosurgery, K.S.Hegde Medical Academy, Deralakatte-575018, Mangalore, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.50742

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3a], [Figure 3b], [Figure 4a], [Figure 4b], [Figure 4c], [Figure 5a], [Figure 5b], [Figure 5c], [Figure 5d]

This article has been cited by
1 Use of autologous comminuted calvarial fragments and pedicled pericranial graft for single stage repair of frontal and cranial base injury
Amit Agrawal,Surya Pratap Singh
The Indian Journal of Neurotrauma. 2013; 10(1): 48
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 The relationship between head injury and facial trauma: a case–control study
Mohammad Zandi,Seyed Rohallah Seyed Hoseini
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013; 17(3): 201
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Video Analysis of the Biomechanics of a Bicycle Accident Resulting in Significant Facial Fractures
Shameer H. Syed,Ryan Willing,Thomas R. Jenkyn,Arjang Yazdani
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2013; 24(6): 2023
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 A Closer Look at Orthopedic Injuries Associated With Maxillofacial Trauma
Mohammad Zandi,Majid Saleh
Journal of Trauma Nursing. 2013; 20(2): 125
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures and Their Association with Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Fractures
Edward P. Buchanan,Richard A. Hopper,Daniel W. Suver,Austin G. Hayes,Joseph S. Gruss,Craig B. Birgfeld
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2012; 130(6): 1296
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Characteristics and Epidemiology of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures :
Katarzyna Bogusiak, Piotr Arkuszewski
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2010; 21(4): 1018
[VIEW] | [DOI]
7 Gingival mucosa regeneration in athymic mice using in vitro engineered human oral mucosa
Mahmoud Rouabhia, Patricia Allaire
Biomaterials. 2010; 31(22): 5798
[VIEW] | [DOI]
8 Split Calvarial Graft to Repair the Large Frontal Bone Defect
Amit Agrawal, Nitish Baisakhiya, Nitin Bhola
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2010; 9(2): 166
[VIEW] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5085    
    Printed229    
    Emailed8    
    PDF Downloaded357    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 8    

Recommend this journal